In my last two columns, I examined the exciting capabilities of real-time bidding (RTB) and the sources of RTB inventory, outlining the opportunity RTB holds for advertisers to achieve better performance from their online display campaigns. Along with these developments, a new category of service providers has emerged, offering advertisers a new way to purchase and manage auction-based media. These providers -- and their technology -- are both referred to as demand-side platforms. Their primary benefit? The advanced technology of demand-side platforms enables advertisers to make the most of real-time bidding capabilities across multiple inventory sources. As such, they play a key role in the evolving auction-based media buying model, and anyone considering RTB in their media plan should understand what they do and what benefits they offer. (Disclosure: I'm the CEO of a demand-side platform.)
Despite their decidedly unexciting moniker, what demand-side platforms can achieve is pretty compelling to anyone who has ever been challenged to improve performance and ROI (define) for an online display campaign. First and foremost, demand-side platforms are designed to give advertisers greater control over pricing, targeting, and managing their online media campaigns. Their mission is to eliminate some of the inefficiencies of the traditional display media buying model -- through automation and advanced analytics -- in order to make those improvements possible.
So what does a demand-side platform do, exactly? They typically offer the following common features:
How do demand-side platforms compare to some of the more common systems and media sources currently used in media planning? In the current display buying model, networks and exchanges selling ad impressions typically define audience categories, set pricing models, and require media buyers to access a different system for each provider in their media plan, across all of their campaigns. (That's a lot of passwords!)
Ad networks also have their advantages, but their inherent need to serve both publishers and advertisers means both sides have had to settle for less than ideal solutions. Demand-side platforms, in contrast, address many of the classic complaints about ad networks, offering advertisers better transparency, efficiency, and accountability. In fact, many have observed that demand-side platforms bring some of the favorable efficiencies of search engine marketing to the realm of display. As for ad servers, many offer significant operational efficiency, but demand-side platforms offer better media efficiency through granular targeting and valuing of individual impressions in real-time bidding. But both can work together easily, because demand-side platforms typically connect with any ad server.
Here is a summary of some of the key benefits of using a demand-side platform:
If you're managing display campaigns and are interested in the benefits of real-time bidding, demand-side platforms are definitely worth serious consideration. You really can't get the full benefits of one without the other.
Mike Baker is president and CEO of DataXu. He has been pioneering digital media platforms for 20 years and is a widely recognized thought leader in interactive advertising. Before cofounding DataXu, he was vice president at Nokia, where he created and ran Nokia Interactive. Baker came to Nokia through its acquisition of mobile advertising leader Enpocket in 2007, where he was the founding investor and CEO. Baker was previously a partner at venture capital firm GrandBanks Capital. He has also been executive vice president at CMGI and Engage Technologies, an innovator in online advertising and behavioral targeting. Baker holds degrees in law and telecommunications management.
May 22, 2013
1:00pm ET / 10:00am PT
June 5, 2013
1:00pm ET / 10:00am PT