Home  › Marketing › Strategies

They've Hijacked Your Inbox -- Is Your Browser Next?

  |  April 8, 2002   |  Comments

It's called Ooqa Ooqa. Is it the most intrusive ad technology yet?

Let's take a quick poll: Who likes spam?

Hmm... I don't see too many hands out there, except you diehard email marketers who don't like anyone criticizing what you do and fear the "slippery slope" argument that regulating spam will infringe on your business. Yeah, right.

Although most hate it, the sad truth is spam works. It must, or I wouldn't keep getting the same lame offers flooding my email box every day. Nobody would bother if people didn't respond.

The same goes for pop-unders. They work, too. Who out there hasn't heard of X10? Now that we mainstream marketers discovered X10's success with its annoying tactic, pop-unders show up just about everywhere. Why? They work. They get responses.

Of course, much of that traffic, according to Jupiter, is "mass, undifferentiated traffic" -- not all that effective. Survey after survey shows consumers hate anything that interferes with their online experience. There's no question consumers hate unsolicited email. But people keep responding, and desperate marketers with dreams of Internet riches keep using these irritating formats. For now.

Why? Online advertising was oversold from the beginning. Its much-touted measurability was its Achilles' heel. In pre-Net days, advertisers knew instinctively the old saw is true: "I know that half my advertising isn't working... I just don't know which half." With the Net, we know exactly what isn't working. But nobody wants to hear it (least of all, those responsible).

Now we search for evermore intrusive models, hoping to create ads that can seize attention from increasingly jaded online consumers. Pop-unders, pop-ups, and other obscuring technologies may get noticed, but have we thought about what the long-term impact to the online experience will be?

A new, horrifying technology is coming out from United Virtualities (the same folks who brought us those irritating "shoskeles" that splash over our screens). It's bound to alienate even more consumers... although I'm certain UV's research will show it "works."

This new technology, the Ooqa Ooqa, allows advertisers to change the toolbar of a user's browser without requiring her to download anything. Details of how this works are sketchy at best. The gist is that Ooqa Ooqa lets ads appear in the browser's toolbar, underneath the buttons used to navigate. Worse, this tech also lets the advertiser change the buttons themselves, turning the "back" button into a "buy" button or the "home" button into one that takes the user to the advertiser's site.

Now I know many of you are salivating over this, and I don't blame you. Having that much control over the user's experience opens up a whole new world of possibilities. No longer do you have to worry that your quarry will back out of your site. No longer do you have to fear that your user might miss your message because it's merely displayed in his browser window. What an incredibly powerful technology!

So are nuclear bombs. But just because we have 'em, doesn't mean we should necessarily use 'em.

Your customers and prospects have a choice. They don't have to come to your site or buy your products or even go on the Internet if they don't want to. Over the past decade or so, most consumer trends have pointed to an increase in consumer desire for more control in their lives -- in their spending and in the choices they make regarding products and services. One of the great draws of the Web is its ability to provide a vast number of choices, allowing consumers to shop wherever, read whatever, and talk to whomever they want.

It's no news to anyone that we're all struggling to keep our industry alive. Though quick-fix trickery might seem attractive now, it's imperative all of us look to the long term and realize if we don't have any customers, none of us will have any businesses. The legitimate email marketing industry has done a fantastic job at policing itself for that very reason, realizing that spam damages the industry in the long run. As we look at new Web-based advertising technologies, we should all consider the lessons of spam and make decisions that work in the long term, not just for the quick buck.

Hijacking browsers is bad business.


Sean Carton

Sean Carton has recently been appointed to develop the Center for Digital Communication, Commerce, and Culture at the University of Baltimore and is chief creative officer at idfive in Baltimore. He was formerly the dean of Philadelphia University's School of Design + Media and chief experience officer at Carton Donofrio Partners, Inc.

COMMENTSCommenting policy

comments powered by Disqus

Get the ClickZ Marketing newsletter delivered to you. Subscribe today!



Featured White Papers

US Consumer Device Preference Report

US Consumer Device Preference Report
Traditionally desktops have shown to convert better than mobile devices however, 2015 might be a tipping point for mobile conversions! Download this report to find why mobile users are more important then ever.

E-Commerce Customer Lifecycle

E-Commerce Customer Lifecycle
Have you ever wondered what factors influence online spending or why shoppers abandon their cart? This data-rich infogram offers actionable insight into creating a more seamless online shopping experience across the multiple devices consumers are using.




  • SEO Specialist
    SEO Specialist (Marcel Digital) - ChicagoSearch Engine Optimization (SEO) Specialist   Marcel Digital is an award winning digital marketing...
  • SEO / SEM Manager
    SEO / SEM Manager (CustomInk) - FairfaxAre you a friendly, motivated, and inquisitive individual? Are you a positive, out-going leader? Are you...
  • SEO Analyst
    SEO Analyst (XO Group) - New YorkSEO Analyst @ XO Group About this Job, You and Our Team: The XO Group SEO Team is looking for you, a passionate...