Every once in a while you stop and... no, not smell the roses. Unload. The stuff that makes you roll your eyes and grind your teeth. It's one of those days, and you're my sounding board. If your glass is half full, you may want to hit delete. But if your day is shrouded in pessimism, read on.
Given the sheer number of these, it could be a whole column. But there's a word limit. And a handful of clients actually read my blather, so I'll tread lightly.
About a week ago, we went to one of our largest clients' headquarters to march out some of the latest, greatest cross-media research to their media team. These are the folks with 30-plus years of data that suggest the optimal media plan is 52 weeks of TV, period.
In the most politically correct way, they recognize and acknowledge a mix is better than a myopic plan consisting of one medium. Give them a mix, they'll blow it away.
So we trotted out the data from our friends at the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB). The client said "We get that a mix is good, but we just don't see where this Internet thing fits in yet." I should pause for a rant, but with 750 words left, I'll press on. After a spirited (but fruitless) debate about where it all fits, the meeting adjourned.
I approached the head curmudgeon for a last, timid shot.
"Mr. Mephistopheles, we've generated some planning inputs over at the ranch and thought you might find them useful. It might help your other agencies view the Internet in a way comparable to other media. We'd be happy to share them with those other agencies. You know, rating points, reach levels, and such. We're aware a print plan hasn't been sold in here for the past decade, the medium being only a 100 and some-odd years old and all, but you might be interested in seeing the information."
Mephistopheles replied, "You know I'm not. Interested, that is. Your best shot is to turn around and walk out of here and hope money falls from the sky. There's a better chance of that than of me approving a plan with your voodoo magic on it."
Despite proof their core audience is watching less and less TV and the competition is using more and more media mixes, they refuse to react. The media landscape has changed dramatically in the past 10 years, yet a plan from 1993 is not materially different from one written in 2003.
I'm grinding my teeth.
I'm losing one of my planners. She's an all-star. The shop she's going to is lucky. She's leaving for the right reasons (not because she doesn't like it here). I applaud her for following her inner voice.
In a management meeting the week she turned in her resignation, we were told by our director that staffing is screwed up. We're too heavy in some places, too light in others. Altogether, we use too many freelancers. Every department in the shop has experienced tremendous fluctuation, save mine. We've been a steady group for three years or so. I pipe up to ask about replacing people (vs. adding). Response, "Well of course we can replace people. I'm talking about incremental hires."
So I proceed to run candidates and move toward replacement. Then, "You can't replace her. Where did you get that idea?" This from the same person behind the quote above, mind you. Compounding my exasperation is the fact we're the most efficient, profitable department in the shop. I'll cut this short in the interest of retaining my current employment status.
My word count's running out, so I'll be brief. These should resonate, even in short form.
Not sure if I feel better, but any more of this might prove unhealthy. Those of you who stuck it out are true warriors. Take the rest of the day off!
Meet Your Favorite ClickZ Contributors
Many of ClickZ's leading expert contributors will be at ClickZ Live, the new online and digital marketing event kicking off in New York (March 31-April 3). Hear from the likes of: Jeremy Hull, Lisa Raehsler, Andrew Goodman, Bryan Eisenberg, Mathew Sweezey, Aaron Kahlow, Stephanie Miller, Simms Jenkins, Jeanne S. Jennings, Dave Hendricks and more!
March 19, 2014