Participation operates under many forms and guises. So how should it be measured?
Clicks are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to measuring online user behavior and Web initiatives' effectiveness. There are far mushier metrics marketers and publishers use to benchmark their initiatives, engagement being one of them, even if there's no real industry consensus as to what the term "engagement" should or does mean.
Engagement is a tough thing to measure. It's not so much a quantifiable thing as it's a user's mental or emotional state, for which time spent is an awkward, inaccurate proxy. Given that just a definition of engagement is elusive, perhaps marketers should consider a related indication of user interest and involvement: participation.
After all, what's more indicative of an interactive channel than an invitation to participate? And to what else can the stunning rise of social media, user-generated media, and Web 2.0 in general be attributed to other than users who are impelled or inspired in some way to participate with online content?
A quick online search turned up a couple different definitions of "participation":
And as you'd suspect, they're not far afield from the concept of engagement:
Of course, participation isn't the easiest thing to measure. It doesn't always occur where you can quantify it relatively easily, such as on your own Web site. Moreover, the quality of different levels of participation varies wildly. Registering as a user in Second Life, for example, is a very different level of participation from becoming an active member of the virtual world. And among active users, levels of participation vary greatly, from hardcore addicts to the occasional day-tripping tourist.
If participation is to be measured, then, how can the quality rather than just the quantity of participation be gauged? Participation includes all sorts of metrics already in play on the Web; engagement is just the beginning. Interaction and behavior also figure into the equation.
How users can participate online is limitless. Games are a solid example (small wonder Google launched an ad product for games this week). Participation in social media is another strong indicator of engagement, involvement, and endorsement. Bryan Eisenberg recently pointed a new plug-in for Google Analytics that measures how often a page has been referred to on Digg, Sphinn, Delicious, StumbleUpon, and Yahoo Inlink -- for starters. More social sites will be added to the roster.
Participation operates in many forms and guises. There are obvious participatory indicators, such as the aforementioned communities and gaming. But opening, reading, and forwarding an e-mail message is also a form of participation. A page view is one level of participation, commenting on that page is a higher level. Clicking on a link is participatory. Online voting, user reviews, and survey completion are also participation. So is signing up, logging in, subscribing, even bookmarking a page. Search is participation, refining a search query represents deeper involvement. At its acme, participation involves creating and sharing: blogging, CGM (define), photo and video sharing, even tweeting and instant messaging.
Of course, participation isn't always positive. Completing a call to action is participation, but so is skipping an ad, navigating away, or deleting a message.
Participation goes beyond interaction. And as such, it's a very slippery metric. It occurs in all channels and forms of digital media. There isn't an analytics package out there that can wrap its arms around all the ways users participate with brands, products, and services across the myriad digital channels.
Perhaps there should be. What do you think? Does the digital media industry need a participation metric? Participate. Share your thoughts.
Join us for a ClickZ Webinar: Transparent CPL Advertising: The Biggest Missed Opportunity in Your Online Strategy on October 15.
Rebecca was previously VP, U.S. operations of Econsultancy, an independent source of advice and insight on digital marketing and e-commerce. Earlier, she held executive marketing and communications positions at strategic e-services companies, including Siegel & Gale, and has worked in the same capacity for global entertainment and media companies, including Universal Television & Networks Group (formerly USA Networks International) and Bertelsmann's RTL Television. As a journalist, she's written on media for numerous publications, including "The New York Times" and "The Wall Street Journal." Rebecca spent five years as Variety's Berlin-based German/Eastern European bureau chief. Rebecca also taught at New York University's Center for Publishing, where she also served on the Electronic Publishing Advisory Group. Rebecca, author of "The Truth About Search Engine Optimization," was ClickZ's editor-in-chief for over seven years.
2015 Holiday Email Guide
The holidays are just around the corner. Download this whitepaper to find out how to create successful holiday email campaigns that drive engagement and revenue.
Three Ways to Make Your Big Data More Valuable
Big data holds a lot of promise for marketers, but are marketers ready to make the most of it to drive better business decisions and improve ROI? This study looks at the hidden challenges modern marketers face when trying to put big data to use.
December 2, 2015
1pm ET/ 10am PT
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
5pm HKT / 5am ET