The IAB defines lead quality and provides guidelines for quantifying quality in line with industry benchmarks.
The Internet Advertising Bureau's (IAB's) recently issued "Marketer & Agency Guide to Lead Quality" (PDF download) defines lead quality and provides guidelines for quantifying quality in line with industry benchmarks. On the whole, it's a worthy effort, but I disagree with some of its conclusions.
According to the IAB, the lead-gen industry "is shifting from a model based on quantity to one based on quality." Quality, according to the IAB, is "the assessment of the consumer's genuine interest in the advertiser's product or service, and therefore, the likelihood that the consumer can be converted into a customer."
It goes on to say:By understanding that Internet leads have measurable components that can reflect the consumer's intent, or influence an advertiser's ability to convert leads into customers, advertisers can proactively measure the quality of each individual lead prior to funneling those leads to their call center or direct mail fulfillment center.
The IAB provides five specific components it thinks will affect lead quality the most. Highlights follow, along with my observations:
Hopefully, the days of offers with incentives (e.g., "to get this camera, you have to select at least two offers") are ending. If the lead was generated in a process geared solely for generating leads, regardless of the user experience, what kind of quality is that? If users are inundated with offers to the point they keep filling them out or abandoning them (those being the two options), I hope those types of user flow days are numbered.
In this category, according to the IAB's committee, the number one verification score is calling a lead before sending it to the advertiser. I don't see the scale in calling every lead prior to data transfer, nor the sense in doing so, but I roll in a circle in which only a small percentage of my customers want to actually call their consumers. As more and more marketers join the online fray, I'm not sure how many will be focused on the phone part of the lead (think Circuit City, P&G, Wal-Mart, etc.). Most are focused on e-mail, more a part of the online experience than the telephone.
The IAB developed 10-point scales for each of the five components. According to the IAB:
To measure the impact of Lead Generation, it is first necessary to determine the channel through which the lead was generated. The six options are:
In days to come, you'll most likely have to take search out of the equation. We'll see a trend in which marketers will tell lead generators if they aren't the company hired to do search, search can't be part of their campaigns. It doesn't make sense for advertisers to compete with providers on keywords, driving up costs and decreasing the clicks on their own offers.
We're already seeing this trend at my firm. We've received a number of messages from marquee advertisers stipulating that if we use search (which we don't), there are keywords we aren't allowed to bid on. I recently moderated a panel discussion with Eric Obeck of SendTec. He said in no uncertain terms that if a company isn't the agency of record for a marketer's campaign, the marketer should outright restrict that company from using search to generate leads for them. There are very few in the lead-generation space with more experience in online and multichannel lead generation than Obeck, so I for one would heed his message.
Traditionally desktops have shown to convert better than mobile devices however, 2015 might be a tipping point for mobile conversions! Download this report to find why mobile users are more important then ever.
Have you ever wondered what factors influence online spending or why shoppers abandon their cart? This data-rich infogram offers actionable insight into creating a more seamless online shopping experience across the multiple devices consumers are using.
October 13, 2015
1pm ET/ 10am PT
November 12, 2015