Pity the poor text link, which garners not a fraction of the attention it so richly deserves.
You really have to pity the text link.
In a world of visually compelling ad placements, such as banners, skyscrapers, and interstitials -- which are increasingly filled with dramatic formats such as video and Flash -- the lowly text link has had a heck of a time getting noticed. To many advertisers, it's a second-rate placement saddled with a multitude of limitations.
True, a few lines of text and a linking URL don't provide much room for creativity. HTML and other rich media formats allow advertisers to enhance their ad messages with images and engage users with interactivity. Text links, on the other hand, depend on copy alone. To complicate things further, they're hampered by stringent character restrictions that can leave even the most inventive copywriter pulling out her hair.
For all of their shortcomings, text links actually have a lot going for them. For one thing, they're not at all offensive -- a characteristic that's particularly valuable these days. They'll surely never be accused of being "annoying," as vokens and full-screen ads often are, and they won't ever be called "intrusive" like pop-ups. They're so unobtrusive, in fact, they're often mistaken for content, which (contrary to common logic) can actually be advantageous. Subtly disguised ad placements, such as advertorials and content integration sponsorships, regularly garner more consumer interest than blatant ad messages, which are so familiar to Internet users they are often subconsciously disregarded. Text links, especially those incorporated into site menu bars or created to mimic search engine results, stand to attract qualified visitors who are genuinely interested in the subject matter the ad message promotes.
Text links are also extremely inexpensive, frequently sold on a cost-per-click or flat-fee basis. They're generally hard-coded into the site, so the amount of exposure the ad will receive is directly related to the amount of traffic the pages experience. Buyers can predict their level of exposure in advance by analyzing traffic logs from comparable months. Often, the number of impressions they end up receiving is staggering, especially when you consider the minimal flat fee.
In theory, these ads should be outperforming many of the more conventional ad formats we regularly employ. In a testament to the neglect from which text links suffer, industry statistics on the effectiveness of these little ads are nearly impossible to come by. Though research on every other ad format under the sun is always readily available to assist media buyers in the decision-making process, we're on our own when considering text links. But as I always say, the best way to measure the value of an ad is to test it yourself.
Our agency recently did just that, incorporating various types of text links into an online ad campaign for a leading Canadian Internet-based travel provider. We used text ads framed by the advertiser's logo, straight text links with a maximum of 30 characters, and menu links designed to impersonate the site's content directory, spreading these out over newspaper sites such as National Post, as well as through news and information portals such as Sympatico and Canada.com.
The menu text link, which was positioned in one portal's "Shop Online" box, generated the highest click-through rate with an average of 6.5 percent. The text ad on the same site averaged a respectable 0.94 percent click-through (to say nothing of the brand awareness produced by the accompanying logo). The remaining ads consistently produced above-average click rates, ranging from 0.3 to 0.7 percent.
With results like these, why is the text link still the black sheep of the online advertising family?
For starters, it's not sexy. Text links don't impress, they don't astonish, and they certainly don't spawn any word-of-mouth promotion. But just because text links can't boast any of these attributes doesn't make them worthless; they're just not designed to be primary placements. Text links work best when they're used to supplement your buys -- to drive that extra bit of traffic your client is looking for and to bring up your overall campaign click rate. Their mere presence can mean the difference between a mediocre campaign and a triumphant online advertising foray.
I think it's high time we all give text links a chance. Work them into your next ad campaign in conjunction with your standard ad formats. Test out copy variations and placement options until you find the right combination for your client. These placements are inexpensive enough that a test buy is an easy sell, and if it works you've got yourself an effective ad option easily integrated into future campaigns. You may even do your part to boost this forgotten placement to the status it deserves.
Twitter Canada MD Kirstine Stewart to Keynote Toronto
ClickZ Live Toronto (May 14-16) is a new event addressing the rapidly changing landscape that digital marketers face. The agenda focuses on customer engagement and attaining maximum ROI through online marketing efforts across paid, owned & earned media. Register now and save!
Tessa Wegert is a business reporter and former media strategist specializing in digital. In addition to writing for ClickZ since 2002, she has contributed to such publications as USA Today, Marketing Magazine, Mashable, and The Globe and Mail. Tessa manages marketing and communications for Enlighten, one of the first full-service digital marketing strategy agencies servicing such brands as Bioré, Food Network, illy, and Hunter Douglas. She has been working in online media since 1999.
9 Strategies to Engage Your Consumers
Online marketing apps are highly engaging - taking visitors on short, but effective, conversion-focused journeys. This white paper illustrates 9 strategies to engaging consumers through app-like experiences.
Redefining 'Mobile-Only' Users: Millions Selectively Avoid the Desktop
A new breed of selective mobile-only consumers has emerged. What are the demos of these users and how and where can marketers reach them?
March 19, 2014