Google filed for a behavioral targeting patent. That's worth your attention.
A headline caught my eye last week as I scrolled through an article list from Search Engine Journal: "Google Advertising Patents for Behavioral Targeting, Personalization and Profiling."
Why would Google's portfolio of intellectual property assets matter to me, as an advertising media person?
This news is of special interest to me, and to behavioral marketers in general, for a few reasons:
Contextual Plus Behavioral
Google wants to become more than a Web search engine. The company's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful.
The path to this goal can be seen in the company's various extensions beyond the search engine, such as Gmail, Google Earth, Google Desktop Search, Google Talk, the Google Toolbar, and who knows what else will emerge from the Sun Microsystems alliance.
Moving toward monetizing this constellation of products and services, as well as broadening the focus from CPC (define) ads on search results pages and adjacent to contextually relevant articles on a network, is understandable and expected.
Behavioral targeting by way of matching advertising to anonymous user-interest profiles is a great way to do this.
For example, behavioral clues about an Internet user's interests beyond her current search can be seen in her search history without impinging on her reasonable expectations to individual privacy:
Yahoo already does this type of data collection at some level through Yahoo Impulse, an extension of ordinary paid search advertising, and other Yahoo-developed behavioral marketing tools.
MSN announced a few weeks back it would roll out behavioral targeting capabilities via MSN adCenter once it's successfully through initial market tests.
The words of Dave Morgan, CEO of TACODA, seem prescient now. In April 2004, at the launch of AudienceMatch Network, he said, "It's much more intuitive for a marketer to buy a person than to buy a keyword.... Over time, we think we're going to see these types of advertising [contextual and behavioral] complementing each other."
Value for Advertisers?
With potentially more sources informing user interest profiles beyond an individual search, such as search histories and usage of various Web and desktop applications, behavioral profiles will only get richer. Richer profiles could equate better targeting.
With more places to deliver ads in addition to search results pages and network sites, reach potential increases. Better reach means more unique opportunities to see, learn, and respond.
In the case of text-based creatives, user preference profiles could be used to personalize ad creatives to some degree, making advertising messages more relevant.
As John Battelle, search blogger and founder of FM Publishing says, search advertising is more about matching a message to a user's intent rather than any content he may eventually view.
To put a twist on this, using search histories and other such behavioral information to inform targeting is about matching ads to a user's movements rather than only the content they view.
Late to the Party?
It seems kind of late for Google to try to own the idea of matching an ad to a user-preference based on user behavior.
Behavioral targeting specialists such as Revenue Science and TACODA have been developing this space for several years via technologies offered through publishers and behavioral ad networks offered directly to advertisers. And, they're very good at it.
Certainly the "ads on site and network pages" approach to behaviorally targeted advertising isn't a new idea. But the idea of running ads across a platform of search engines, a network of sites, and various Web- and desktop-based applications is new.
It's not for everyone.
Major brand advertisers are still interested in rich media placements in high-quality editorial environments, planned for high-composition or high-reach branded content sites.
The present model works for now. But I can envision a day in the not-too-distant future when the 80 percent banners approach to Internet marketing seems a quaint memory.
That's why Google filing for a behavioral targeting patent is worth Internet marketers' attention. It makes them think about the direction things are moving toward.
David Rittenhouse is group planning director on the IBM account at Neo@Ogilvy. He's a recent transplant from London where he spent four years with mOne EMEA. David's been working in Internet marketing and media for over 8 years, across a number of technology, telecommunications, and consumer electronics businesses.
US Consumer Device Preference Report
Traditionally desktops have shown to convert better than mobile devices however, 2015 might be a tipping point for mobile conversions! Download this report to find why mobile users are more important then ever.
E-Commerce Customer Lifecycle
Have you ever wondered what factors influence online spending or why shoppers abandon their cart? This data-rich infogram offers actionable insight into creating a more seamless online shopping experience across the multiple devices consumers are using.
October 13, 2015
1pm ET/ 10am PT
November 12, 2015