IAB New Ad Units: What's Next?

• Tweet
• Buffer

Recently, the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) issued voluntary guidelines for new interactive marketing units:

New IAB Interactive Marketing Units

120	x	600	IMU	Skyscraper
160	x	600	IMU	Wide Skyscraper
180	x	150	IMU	Rectangle
300	x	250	IMU	Medium Rectangle
336	x	280	IMU	Large Rectangle
240	x	400	IMU	Vertical Rectangle
250	x	250	IMU	Square Pop-Up

These guidelines have come on the heels of the highly promoted new ad units on CNET and other large Web sites looking for new and better opportunities for online advertisers. Nothing like a bit of belt-tightening and job insecurity to get people off their asses and start making much-needed changes to the options for the advertisers that keep publishers in business.

This first step is not bad; it moves us toward the maturation of the online advertising environment. But the truth is that standardized ad units are still more for the benefit of the sellers of ad space than for the buyers. In some ways it's the repetition of a formula that didn't work the first time. To quote Randall Rothenberg of Ad Age, "In hindsight, though, that mid-'90s push to standardize banners seems utterly misplaced, for it was a supply-side effort that neglected the needs of the demand side."

Don't get me wrong, the old standard ad sizes definitely needed to be updated:

Existing Banner Units

468	x	60	IMU	Full Banner
234	x	60	IMU	Half Banner
120	x	240	IMU	Vertical Banner
120	x	90	IMU	Button #1
120	x	60	IMU	Button #2
125	x	125	IMU	Square Button
88	x	31	IMU	Micro Button

While adding new ad-unit standards does take an incremental step forward in improving the current online advertising climate, some other changes could take it one step further:

• Open acceptance of rich media created with Flash as a standardized rich media format. Considering that 96.4 percent of worldwide users can see files created in this format, the industry should start thinking beyond ad dimensions; it's time to start thinking about the Web -- about relevant technologies that improve the overall Web experience.
  
  
• Adoption of streaming frame rate limits rather than final file-size limitations. One of the main reasons publishers demand that online ads be of a specific (small) file size is obviously because they don't want the ads to interfere with the quick download of their Web pages, a requirement that users demand. Let's say that your typical online publisher demands that a user on a 56k modem be able to download an entire page with ads in 10 seconds. Let's be conservative and say that means a 5k-per-second download rate: 10 seconds x 5k = a 50k page, which is actually bigger than your average portal page weight. For the purpose of this discussion, what if publishers demanded that 12k of the ad be permitted to download in those key first 10 seconds, and that rich media ad units stream at a 5k rate after the first 10 seconds? This would allow advertisers to stream in files that are significantly larger than the existing file sizes while still being sensitive to page download.
  
  
• Increased production values of online ads. By now, most of the available royalty-free photography has been used to death on the Web. While photo stock can do the trick, the Web has grown up enough to deserve better. The costs of online campaigns and Web sites are now a considerable investment. Allocating a small portion of that investment to original photography, illustration, and motion graphics can go a long way toward taking online advertising creative to the next level.

The industry never moves as fast as one would want, and often progress is the result of many small, incremental steps forward. Therefore, we should all be pleased, in a sense, that the dot-com fallout and decline of the Nasdaq are forcing everyone to work harder.

It seems that as the Web has become more mainstream, the tolerance for mediocrity has waned. The Net isn't new anymore, and tech-speak, gobbledygook, and "new economy" jargon have in many ways been exposed as so much smoke and mirrors that look or sound good in theory but don't work so well in practice.