Home  › Marketing › Strategies

Media Agencies vs. Ad Networks

  |  May 5, 2008   |  Comments

As an advertiser, why would you buy from an ad network that can mark up inventory to any amount it likes?

There are three kinds of ad networks: rep firms, aggregators, and arbitrageurs. Today, I'll focus on the second two; I have an issue with the way those two types of networks function within the advertising ecosystem.

Ad networks, especially arbitrageurs, take advantage of market inefficiency and strip dollars out of the ecosystem. Ad networks take between 20 and 60 percent of the ad dollars that flow through their hands. Dollars that, were they returned to the advertiser, would be spent on more media. Or that would be paid to the publisher for providing inventory to the advertiser.

Ad networks do often take risk, paying upfront for inventory they may not be able to sell. And they do provide a valuable service. But they take too much money out of the ecosystem for their services.

The primary value an networks provide is liquidity. They help publishers clear inventory that would otherwise go unsold. They provide low-cost inventory to advertisers. Some ad networks provide additional value through technology, sometimes using targeting criteria to increase the value of inventory that would otherwise be sold for a pittance. The main problem from a publisher's perspective is that the ad network in most cases uses that targeting information to increase its margins, not the publisher's.

Ad networks essentially perform many of the same functions as a media agency, buying an immense amount of inventory from publishers. And they do this much more efficiently than the media agencies. Beyond buying for a low price, which network buying teams are very good at doing, they're able to buy much more inventory from many more publishers.

The average media-agency buying group of 100 buyers can support buying from as many as 200 publishers in any given year. Yes, the math is simple: each buyer is supporting as many as two publishers during the course of a year. At the same time, the average ad network with 100 buyers is buying media from as many as 20,000 publishers in any given year. They're somehow finding a way to be much more efficient in their buying processes than media agencies are.

It's only a matter of time before media agencies start learning new techniques from the ad networks and adopting the same media-buying techniques as the arbitrageurs. But agencies are not arbitrageurs; they act (as the name implies) as the advertiser's agents. In fact, it's illegal in the United States for an agency to mark up inventory it has purchased on behalf of an advertiser. Most agencies these days negotiate with a major advertiser's procurement office to lock down the margins the agency will profit on from the work it performs for the advertiser.

With fixed margins negotiated with the advertiser, there will be an immense amount of pressure applied to the margins ad networks can take. After all, as an advertiser, why would you buy from an ad network that can mark up inventory to any amount it likes when you can negotiate a deal with an agent whose only job is to spend your dollars as efficiently as possible?

Between business models and technology, it's going to change. Those networks that survive the ecosystem's shifting priorities will be those with exceptional technology, those that can add incredible value to the inventory they're buying. Technologies like targeting and ROI (define) optimization for those networks that adopt a primarily media-buying focus will be critical. And for those acting more on behalf of publishers, increasing their yield will be the primary value -- with yield optimization technologies and, again, targeting on the forefront of the model.

And then there are the ad exchanges, which bring another model to the mix. They offer a big change in the way the market clears inventory. It should be an interesting few years as this all sorts itself out. The only certainty is that change is coming.


Eric Picard Eric Picard is the director of advertising strategy and emerging media planning at Microsoft Digital Advertising Solutions. In his role, he helps set corporate-level strategy for how Microsoft approaches advertising from a business and technology standpoint. His team manages long-term advertising platform and product strategy, emerging media strategy, and planning for incubation and research teams, and designs next generation advertising products. Formerly, Eric was founder and director of product management at Bluestreak, where he oversaw advertising products, such as third-party ad serving, ad analytics, and rich media and led development of many company technologies. He helped pioneer rich media advertising in the late '90s and has been active in most of the critical industry conversations related to technology, including the IAB's Measurement Committee and Rich Media Task Force. Prior to Bluestreak, Eric founded 9th Square Inc. and Waterworks Interactive Inc.

COMMENTSCommenting policy

comments powered by Disqus

ClickZ Today is our #1 newsletter.
Get a daily dose of digital marketing.



Featured White Papers

2015 Holiday Email Guide

2015 Holiday Email Guide
The holidays are just around the corner. Download this whitepaper to find out how to create successful holiday email campaigns that drive engagement and revenue.

Three Ways to Make Your Big Data More Valuable

Three Ways to Make Your Big Data More Valuable
Big data holds a lot of promise for marketers, but are marketers ready to make the most of it to drive better business decisions and improve ROI? This study looks at the hidden challenges modern marketers face when trying to put big data to use.