Are you asking for too much information from your customers?
In real life we are very careful to follow social rules and norms and not to act inappropriately. We give people their "space" and a high degree of privacy. In business transactions we also follow certain etiquette. But online, maybe because of the anonymity of the Web, we marketers get very nosy. We start asking for information simply because it might be useful to us in the future, not often considering the negative impact on conversion rates.
Imagine walking into a brick-and-mortar store and being greeted by a brusque clerk at the door who asks you if they may "hold onto your credit card while you browse the store." Such a request would be met with disbelief, laughter or both. But online, equally inane behavior is often exhibited on landing pages.
As Seth Godin correctly points out in his book, "Permission Marketing," Web visitors are in control. They decide the terms of their interactions with our landing pages, and by default, our products and services. Marketer must ensure that the value scale tips in favor of the visitor. In other words, we must give as much as we can, and ask for as little as possible in return at each stage of our deepening relationship with the visitor. We can't expect them to endure hardships or a loss of control in order to supply us with information.
Consider one of my agency's clients: a major research university health care system. Like many U.S. hospitals, they make most of their profits on elective surgeries and do everything they can to publicize their efficacy and availability. One of the tactics used to market bariatric (obesity) surgery was an online registration form to attend an in-person seminar for prospective patients.
Part of the online form to sign up for the seminar asked for "BMI." Even if you knew that BMI stood for body mass index, chances are you do not know how to immediately calculate it. The form did supply a supporting link that showed the formula for calculating one's BMI, but why was all of this necessary in the first place? No one would subject himself to an in-person two-hour medical seminar unless he is serious about the procedure. In any case, the seminar organizers could quickly eyeball the attendees and determine who were likely candidates. Asking for the BMI information was completely unnecessary and intrusive, and probably significantly lowered seminar signups.
Another client, HearingPlanet.com, was collecting online leads by offering a free downloadable "Buyer's Guide to Hearing Aids." However, in order to download the guide, one had to complete the request form on the landing page, which included fields asking for the visitor's physical mailing address. This information was clearly unnecessary to simply download the guide.
When address fields were removed from the form (see the shorter version below), form-fills jumped by 17 percent. The company determined that the remaining information is important, including: first and last name, e-mail, daytime phone, state, and an optional comment field. However, this is not the minimum of information required to download the guide. Most marketers would still insist that you need a valid e-mail address. But this too is a product of the inappropriate online information gathering greed that we suffer under. In fact, no data at all is necessary to download an electronic document.
In the case of Hearing Planet, it can be argued that the better option might be to let the download go viral and be spread as quickly as possible among prospects, their families, healthcare decision makers, and caregivers. Nothing is really lost in the process since the downloaded document contains links back to actionable landing pages. If they find the guide helpful, it will establish thought leadership and a tangible way to remember and get back in touch at a date of the visitor's choosing. The only thing we marketers would lose in the process is a sense of control. But what we gain is far greater: increased conversions and the beginning of a customer relationship that can be nurtured and developed over time.
Tim Ash is CEO of SiteTuners.com, a landing page optimization firm that offers conversion consulting, full-service guaranteed-improvement tests, and software tools to improve conversion rates. SiteTuners' AttentionWizard.com visual attention prediction tool can be used on a landing page screenshot or mock-up to quickly identify major conversion issues. He has worked with Google, Facebook, American Express, CBS, Sony Music, Universal Studios, Verizon Wireless, Texas Instruments, and Coach.
Tim is a highly-regarded presenter at SES, eMetrics, PPC Summit, Affiliate Summit, PubCon, Affiliate Conference, and LeadsCon. He is the chairperson of ConversionConference.com, the first conference focused on improving online conversions. A columnist for several publications including ClickZ, he's host of the weekly Landing Page Optimization show and podcast on WebmasterRadio.fm. His columns can be found in the Search Engine Watch archive.
He received his B.S. and M.S. during his Ph.D. studies at UC San Diego. Tim is the author of the bestselling book, "Landing Page Optimization."
Connect with Tim on Google+.
US Consumer Device Preference Report
Traditionally desktops have shown to convert better than mobile devices however, 2015 might be a tipping point for mobile conversions! Download this report to find why mobile users are more important then ever.
E-Commerce Customer Lifecycle
Have you ever wondered what factors influence online spending or why shoppers abandon their cart? This data-rich infogram offers actionable insight into creating a more seamless online shopping experience across the multiple devices consumers are using.
September 9, 2015
12pm ET/9am PT
September 16, 2015
12pm ET/9am PT
September 23, 2015
12pm ET/ 9am PT