SEO: Search Engine Optimists?

  |  June 27, 2003   |  Comments

Marketers are waking up to the power of search. Too bad they often squander the opportunity.

"I’m getting worried about search engine marketing (SEM)," wrote Rebecca Lieb, executive editor of ClickZ, in her What’s the Buzz? column a few weeks ago. "Irrational exuberance is beginning to emerge," she added, and I agree with her. A new survey provides further evidence of how last year’s search engine skeptic has evolved into this year’s search engine optimist.

NetIQ WebTrends and iProspect surveyed over 800 marketing professionals and reported that:

  • 77 percent of users surveyed are currently using or evaluating paid search strategies.

  • 41 percent are actively running paid search campaigns.

  • 31 percent of users don’t measure their SEM activities at all.

  • 60 percent of those who do measure are only measuring basic click-through results and general traffic activity.

  • 27 percent are measuring through to conversion.

  • 11 percent are conducting detailed return on investment (ROI) analysis looking at revenue by search phrase and lifetime value.

The survey isn’t truly scientific because it’s a self-selected sample. It’s also probably skewed in favor of those marketing professionals interested in furthering their education and optimizing their Web marketing.

Still, it’s frightening to realize as hot as search is, so many are failing to maximize its potential. Conversion rates measure success, yet way too many Web marketers equate success with traffic. Every visit should end in a conversion!

Not every conversion needs to be a transaction, however. I’ve previously described the difference between macroactions (overall goals) and microactions (all the actions a visitor needs to take to achieve a macroaction). Not every visitor is in the same phase of the buying process; so what phase the person is in determines the different "conversion" metrics we define.

We sort our keywords by traffic potential, buying-process phase, explicitness of intent, and the persuasion scenario we’ve identified. Once the visitors are on the site, we ask our clients to measure and track many of the following metrics:

  • Where the visitor comes from

  • What the visitor knows

  • What the visitor sees

  • What the visitor engages with

  • What the visitor refers to others

  • What the visitor prints

  • Who the visitor is

  • Where the visitor goes

  • How to contact the visitor

This data helps us constantly improve the persuasion architecture of the Web site.

Fredrick Marckini, CEO of iProspect, explains the value of understanding intent this way:

The act of constructing a query requires more user participation, initiative, and involvement than surfing and clicking -- the action that banner ads hope to interrupt. Instead, the behavior of search requires an Internet user to actually make a request using language -- a request for an advertiser in most cases. The search engine user is actually engaged in seeking a purchase opportunity. The specific construction by a search engine user of a multi-keyword phrase can demonstrate significant conversion potential, e.g., ’buy cars online’ versus ’cars.’ The language they use in constructing that query will evidence different degrees of intent -- but make no mistake, the act of constructing a query is the greatest indication of intent available on the Internet.

Regrettably, too few marketers understand the true significance and power of SEM. They mistakenly assume because some percentage of traffic converts they can ignore the traffic that does not. Similarly, early direct marketers focused on pushing their messages out to large audiences and only paid attention to what stuck. The strongest evolved into database marketers who focused as intently on people who didn’t buy as on those who did. Database marketers track what offers don’t work so they can study and optimize them. At best, the vast majority of Web marketers are mentally in the same place as the early direct marketers. Financially, however, they have a greater commitment.

It’s frightening to contemplate so many millions of dollars flushed away. The sad part is much of that money is considered well spent by the companies investing it. They see the ROI based on current conversion rates, without regard to what the ROI would be using persuasive architecture, then they set their anemic goals accordingly. Though the opportunity cost is staggering, management remains complacent. Worse, many are ignorant of the opportunity cost because they don’t know how to measure the opportunity and capture the sales. Regardless of their motivation, they’re obviously not well prepared to be thinking about the long-term viability of their companies. Besides, why would they want to upset the status quo with so many difficult questions?

One day a competitor will come along and invest the time and effort deliberately designing the persuasion architecture of its Web site. This competitor will learn from the intentional feedback loop created by defining metrics in the planning stage and engage in a process of continual conversion rate optimization. The competitor will learn how to provide an increasingly better experience to its visitors. When this upstart finally puts the complacent company out of business, it might explain it was simple because there was such a great deal of missed opportunity to exploit.

The bottom line is your prospects arrive at your Web site because they recognize a need, problem, or opportunity. They are telling you by the words they use and the scenarios they click through. They want you to provide a solution. Eventually, they will find that solution. The only question is whether it will be at your Web site. Are you really doing all you can to make sure you give your visitors what they want?


Bryan Eisenberg

Bryan Eisenberg is co-founder and chief marketing officer (CMO) of IdealSpot. He is co-author of the Wall Street Journal, Amazon, BusinessWeek, and New York Times best-selling books Call to Action, Waiting For Your Cat to Bark?, and Always Be Testing, and Buyer Legends. Bryan is a keynote speaker and has keynoted conferences globally such as Gultaggen,, Direct Marketing Association, MarketingSherpa, Econsultancy, Webcom, the Canadian Marketing Association, and others for the past 10 years. Bryan was named a winner of the Marketing Edge's Rising Stars Awards, recognized by eConsultancy members as one of the top 10 User Experience Gurus, selected as one of the inaugural iMedia Top 25 Marketers, and has been recognized as most influential in PPC, Social Selling, OmniChannel Retail. Bryan serves as an advisory board member of several venture capital backed companies such as Sightly, UserTesting, Monetate, ChatID, Nomi, and BazaarVoice. He works with his co-author and brother Jeffrey Eisenberg. You can find them at

COMMENTSCommenting policy

comments powered by Disqus

Get the ClickZ Analytics newsletter delivered to you. Subscribe today!



Featured White Papers

2015 Holiday Email Guide

2015 Holiday Email Guide
The holidays are just around the corner. Download this whitepaper to find out how to create successful holiday email campaigns that drive engagement and revenue.

Three Ways to Make Your Big Data More Valuable

Three Ways to Make Your Big Data More Valuable
Big data holds a lot of promise for marketers, but are marketers ready to make the most of it to drive better business decisions and improve ROI? This study looks at the hidden challenges modern marketers face when trying to put big data to use.