The ins and outs of anti-spam technologies -- in layman’s terms. Part two of a series.
Part one of this series looks at the new technologies that help with email deliverability, SPF (define) in particular. Another emerging technology is Sender ID. As with SPF, Rick Buck, director of e-media and privacy/ISP relations at e-Dialog, helped me understand Sender ID and how it differs from SPF.
Here’s the scoop, in plain English.
Sender ID takes email authentication a step further than SPF. As with SPF, Sender ID technology confirms the server is authorized to send email on behalf of the domain names listed. Instead of verifying the "envelope address" as SPF does, Sender ID looks at the purported responsible address (PRA) or "message from" address, which is a little deeper inside the email message.
Like SPF, Sender ID confirms the address at the domain-name level. This means it can confirm an email came from a Yahoo server, but not from a specific Yahoo user. One selling point for Sender ID is it can handle forwarded email for which multiple sender addresses are involved better than SPF. Many technology folks agree Sender ID provides more reliable "proof" of an email message’s origin.
Now, the rub: although SPF is a bit controversial, Sender ID has ignited a firestorm. I won’t go into all the tawdry details, but it’s almost as good as an episode of "Desperate Housewives."
Sender ID got a lift in August 2004 when the Email Service Providers Coalition (ESPC) reiterated its support for Sender ID while acknowledging it’s only a first step toward solving the spam problem.
Then, in September 2004, the MTA Authorization Records in DNS (MARID) working group, which was tasked with defining a universal email authentication system, was shut down. The reason given by its parent, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), was lack of agreement on basic issues, many involving Sender ID.
Sender ID was a lightning rod for discussion at a November 2004 summit on authentication sponsored by the FTC. Why? Sender ID was developed by Microsoft, which is in the process of patenting key parts of the technology. Licensing requirements that often surround patent technologies are what concern open source advocates. They say these requirements typically preclude use in open source software, which is the foundation of the Internet world.
Just last week, MX Logic reported 13 percent of the spam it filtered in January was found to be Sender ID or SPF compliant, suggesting neither technology is really a viable solution to the spam problem. It also questions whether additional resources dedicated to either are worthwhile.
But don’t count Sender ID out quite yet. It’s been rumored to be dead before, notably last year, when partner AOL announced it would no longer support it. AOL came back to the table when Microsoft made the technology SPF compatible.
All the major email service providers (ESPs) have announced their outbound email complies with Sender ID and SPF. Senders who have updated their DNS (define) entries to include their SPF records won’t necessarily need to publish a new record for Sender ID, though Microsoft recommends ESPs may want to.
Microsoft has begun to implement Sender ID checks on email coming into MSN and Hotmail accounts. It’s only one factor in a scoring system to determine what email is spam. Microsoft says it will increase the weight Sender ID carries within that formula as the company sees how it works going forward.
Where will the email world net out on Sender ID? Wish I knew. Meanwhile, it’s an intriguing debate to follow. Here are some resources to learn more:
Next, we’ll cover DomainKeys, which many see as an improvement on both SPF and Sender ID, if still not a perfect spam solution.
Want more email marketing information? ClickZ E-Mail Reference is an archive of all our email columns, organized by topic.
Join the Industry's Leading eCommerce & Direct Marketing Experts in Chicago
ClickZ Live Chicago (Nov 3-6) will deliver over 50 sessions across 4 days and 10 individual tracks, including Data-Driven Marketing, Social, Mobile, Display, Search and Email. Check out the full agenda and register by Friday, Oct 3 to take advantage of Early Bird Rates!
Jeanne Jennings is a 20 year veteran of the online/email marketing industry, having started her career with CompuServe in the late 1980s. As Vice President of Global Strategic Services for Alchemy Worx, Jennings helps organizations become more effective and more profitable online. Previously Jennings ran her own email marketing consultancy with a focus on strategy; clients included AARP, Hasbro, Scholastic, Verizon and Weight Watchers International. Want to learn more? Check out her blog.
IBM Social Analytics: The Science Behind Social Media Marketing
80% of internet users say they prefer to connect with brands via Facebook. 65% of social media users say they use it to learn more about brands, products and services. Learn about how to find more about customers' attitudes, preferences and buying habits from what they say on social media channels.
The Multiplier Effect of Integrating Search & Social Advertising
Latest research reveals 68% higher revenue per conversion for marketers who integrate their search & social advertising. In addition to the research results, this whitepaper also outlines 5 strategies and 15 tactics you can use to better integrate your search and social campaigns.
September 17, 2014
September 23, 2014
September 30, 2014
1:00pm ET/10:00am PT