Home  › Search › Paid Search

Attribution and View-Through Search Conversions

  |  May 11, 2012   |  Comments

Factoring offline search stimuli into an attribution model.

Credit should be given to media and marketing touch points where credit is due. The fundamental premise behind attribution models and more sophisticated econometric marketing mix models is that influence delivered by a marketing, media, or advertising touch point can often be measured. If it can be measured, then the value of influence in changing attitudes or driving sales can be quantified. Then that data can be modeled and an optimal marketing mix model can be arrived at. It's the Holy Grail of marketing.

I applaud all the marketers who are taking steps to further understand the impact of all the digital touch points under their control. I'll touch on some significant challenges regarding use of even the digital-only touch points shortly because, after all, we assume that digital media is eminently measurable, in comparison to offline media. However, let's look at offline media and marketing first, because digital media and in particular, search engine marketing (SEM), does not exist in a silo. Search behavior is highly sensitive to external stimuli. Searchers are people and people don't search in a vacuum. Something stimulates a high percentage of search behaviors. For commercial searches (those with commercial intent), the stimuli are often marketing and media messages, both offline and online.

Offline search stimuli are very difficult to put into an attribution model. Search itself may be one of your best metrics to determine that stimulus occurred. Not all external search stimuli can be tracked like a mention in the press. Consider for the moment the following events where curiosity stimulates search behavior (immediate, perhaps on a mobile device or lagged search behavior):

  • Consumer interacts with your brand in offline advertising (OK, that can be econometrically modeled if your spending is high enough).
  • Consumer sees an ad from one of your competitors (and does a category search).
  • Consumer notices marketing messages from your brand or a competitive brand in the home or workplace.
  • Your brand or category comes up in a phone or in-person conversation.
  • Consumer interacts with your brand in a retail store environment, or you are the store brand and the consumer interacts with store staff.
  • Consumer interacts with competing brands in a store environment, but remembers that you are in the same category and a search ensues.
  • Consumer sees your brand or a category brand in a product placement on TV or a movie.
  • Consumer uses your brand (prior purchase, borrowed, or other opportunity).

Clearly, you'll never be able to capture most of these offline touch points in an attribution model, so they add a significant amount of noise to the data you are doing a deep dive into.

Of course, the promise of digital is that the data points are much more trackable, particularly the paid media touch points, such as paid search clicks and display media impressions and clicks. As a matter of fact, view-through searches, view-through visits, and view-through conversions are an important way to understand and quantify the impact of your display campaigns. As long as you aren't paying a vendor on view-through conversions and you structure experiments to understand incremental lift, you indeed have taken a step in the right direction. It's starting to sound like you can indeed close the loop in paid digital media. But what about earned social media? Facebook and Twitter data are available, but for most advertisers, you'd need a very viral success to break through the statistical noise of the other data in your campaigns.

Clearly, a lot of noise is made about the importance of measuring lift in view-through conversions for paid media, and these days, even earned social media such as forwarded tweets, shared posts, and "likes" are being considered for attribution models and even for marketing mix models. What about paid and organic high-position search engine results page (SERP) impressions? Research has shown that even if the consumer doesn't click on a link in the SERP, they often recall a company/domain being there. More leaky data. Add to the leaky SERP impressions the fact that many ads are being enhanced to make them pop visually (Plus Box, Images, Reviews, Pushpins, Sitelinks, and the "Rich Ads in Search" all contribute to "branding and influence" within the SERP). Search in this case isn't getting full credit.

Also, seasoned SEM managers using good campaign management technology have for years been factoring in the early buy funnel terms in providing influence that may result in a latter (last click) search conversion later on. Therefore, when building any attribution models, understand the often significant limitations to the models and to the transformation of the attribution models into a marketing mix model.

Tags:

ClickZ Live Chicago Join the Industry's Leading eCommerce & Direct Marketing Experts in Chicago
ClickZ Live Chicago (Nov 3-6) will deliver over 50 sessions across 4 days and 10 individual tracks, including Data-Driven Marketing, Social, Mobile, Display, Search and Email. Check out the full agenda and register by Friday, Oct 3 to take advantage of Early Bird Rates!

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Kevin Lee

Kevin Lee, Didit cofounder and executive chairman, has been an acknowledged search engine marketing expert since 1995. His years of SEM expertise provide the foundation for Didit's proprietary Maestro search campaign technology. The company's unparalleled results, custom strategies, and client growth have earned it recognition not only among marketers but also as part of the 2007 Inc 500 (No. 137) as well as three-time Deloitte's Fast 500 placement. Kevin's latest book, "Search Engine Advertising" has been widely praised.

Industry leadership includes being a founding board member of SEMPO and its first elected chairman. "The Wall St. Journal," "BusinessWeek," "The New York Times," Bloomberg, CNET, "USA Today," "San Jose Mercury News," and other press quote Kevin regularly. Kevin lectures at leading industry conferences, plus New York, Columbia, Fordham, and Pace universities. Kevin earned his MBA from the Yale School of Management in 1992 and lives in Manhattan with his wife, a New York psychologist and children.

COMMENTSCommenting policy

comments powered by Disqus

Get the ClickZ Search newsletter delivered to you. Subscribe today!

COMMENTS

UPCOMING EVENTS

Featured White Papers

IBM: Social Analytics - The Science Behind Social Media Marketing

IBM Social Analytics: The Science Behind Social Media Marketing
80% of internet users say they prefer to connect with brands via Facebook. 65% of social media users say they use it to learn more about brands, products and services. Learn about how to find more about customers' attitudes, preferences and buying habits from what they say on social media channels.

An Introduction to Marketing Attribution: Selecting the Right Model for Search, Display & Social Advertising

An Introduction to Marketing Attribution: Selecting the Right Model for Search, Display & Social Advertising
If you're considering implementing a marketing attribution model to measure and optimize your programs, this paper is a great introduction. It also includes real-life tips from marketers who have successfully implemented attribution in their organizations.

Jobs

    • Tier 1 Support Specialist
      Tier 1 Support Specialist (Agora Inc.) - BaltimoreThis position requires a highly motivated and multifaceted individual to contribute to and be...
    • Recent Grads: Customer Service Representative
      Recent Grads: Customer Service Representative (Agora Financial) - BaltimoreAgora Financial, one of the nation's largest independent publishers...
    • Managing Editor
      Managing Editor (Common Sense Publishing) - BaltimoreWE’RE HIRING: WE NEED AN AMAZING EDITOR TO POLISH WORLD-CLASS CONTENT   The Palm...