Are you stopping your own growth by preventing your staff from living up to their potential within your company?
We are working for a company that wants us to better understand if their customer experience is "working" for them, and if they are sufficiently closing the loop on customer service by actually enacting changes in their business based on customer feedback. This is all in an effort to achieve the maximum return on investment (ROI) they can from their customers and their customer support.
However, something we observed in this company really stands out, and is a much larger problem for them. To put it bluntly, they treat their employees like crap. It is astounding to me that a company that has so much care for its customers (and understanding how customers feel about their brand) is not taking its own medicine and applying this logic in-house.
Let's start with some old adages we keep hearing them bounce around in boardrooms:
That's all well and good, and nothing we don't already know. But this company takes the exact opposite approach when it comes to their staff. From our observations, it seems to be the owners' attitudes that:
What a way to run a business, right? I am astounded by this behavior. To be fair, this is not a Fortune 500 e-commerce company (the mainstay of my company's client base). This is a smallish mom and pop store that we offered to help out due to some personal connections to the company. Do these behaviors happen with the big guys? Yes, of course, but usually in a less transparent or egregious way. Most companies that grew up in the dot-com era were built on the principals of treating your staff as your best asset, and encouraging them to enjoy their life at the company.
That's the world I grew up in, and the companies I've worked for have certainly understood that. The company in question, however, doesn't have the same pedigree, and it is eye opening for me. It does make me wonder how many of the smaller companies (that I simply don't come into contact with as often) have these kinds of problems.
In our report for this company (helping them understand where they are losing on their bottom line) we are going to put in a large section about this issue. Like any company, their bottom line is obviously affected by how much money they are bringing in. But it is also affected by their expenses, and their efficiency.
Because they have created a hostile/toxic work environment, they have employees who aren't interested in making the company successful any longer, and aren't willing to put their necks out with new ideas that could help the company. Having witnessed this firsthand, I can tell you this is not the fault of the employees, who universally seem to have had the joy sucked out of them at this company. There have been three staff replacements in the five weeks since we've been on site. Clearly this costs the company a lot of money. Some of the issues were in the vetting process, and some were in the training process. Either way, these new staff members were destined to fail from the beginning, and the company tends to take a "one strike and you're out" policy, which shoots them in the foot as much as anything else.
In the report we file, we will talk about "employee churn," "employee lifetime value," and other terms we'd normally associate with customers. It is our hope that they will realize that their best chance of growing the business is to actually let their employees grow and prosper instead of treating them like cattle.
ROI comes in many shapes and sizes. And while we're constantly looking at customers to figure out how to make more money, sometimes it's required for us to look inside the walls of our cubicles and understand how we're stopping our own growth by preventing our staff from living up to their potential within our companies.
Thoughts, comments? Please leave them below!
Until next time...
Team image on home page via Shutterstock.
This column was originally published on July 20, 2012.
Join the Industry's Leading eCommerce & Direct Marketing Experts in Chicago
ClickZ Live Chicago (Nov 3-6) will deliver over 50 sessions across 4 days and 10 individual tracks, including Data-Driven Marketing, Social, Mobile, Display, Search and Email. Check out the full agenda and register by Friday, Oct 3 to take advantage of Early Bird Rates!
Jack Aaronson, CEO of The Aaronson Group and corporate lecturer, is a sought-after expert on enhanced user experiences, customer conversion, retention, and loyalty. If only a small percentage of people who arrive at your home page transact with your company (and even fewer return to transact again), Jack and his company can help. He also publishes a newsletter about multichannel marketing, personalization, user experience, and other related issues. He has keynoted most major marketing conferences around the world and regularly speaks at Shop.org and other major industry shows. You can learn more about Jack through his LinkedIn profile.
IBM Social Analytics: The Science Behind Social Media Marketing
80% of internet users say they prefer to connect with brands via Facebook. 65% of social media users say they use it to learn more about brands, products and services. Learn about how to find more about customers' attitudes, preferences and buying habits from what they say on social media channels.
An Introduction to Marketing Attribution: Selecting the Right Model for Search, Display & Social Advertising
If you're considering implementing a marketing attribution model to measure and optimize your programs, this paper is a great introduction. It also includes real-life tips from marketers who have successfully implemented attribution in their organizations.
September 23, 2014
September 30, 2014
1:00pm ET/10:00am PT
October 23, 2014
1:00pm ET/10:00am PT