With partner categories, Facebook eliminates too-broad targeting and helps ensure that the category you belong to is relevant.
Could Facebook's new segment targeting solution, called "partner categories," finally open up competitive, cost-effective ad serving to small and mid-size businesses? This new feature divides users into one of 500 categories, such as "people who like to buy fresh produce" or "people who like to ride bikes." This information is then filtered through location-specific data categories, such as Zip code or the city you've designated as your location. Under the old data model, attractive segments would then be bid on in order to figure out to whom a business should advertise. With the new system, if a small business knows what categories it wants, those are the categories it can choose from. While it may seem similar, the differences could be monumental in terms of a company's ability to manage spend effectiveness.
Segment data comes from the providers Acxiom, Epsilon, and Datalogix. They refine and help manage the data that comes from consumers' interests, likes, purchases, etc. While information from these companies is pricey - often too expensive for smaller businesses - Facebook took notice and decided to shoulder the costs of retrieving this data. No longer will companies have to pay for the data, and then turn around and pay for the actual campaign. Instead, just pick your category and the money can go straight to ads. Win for Facebook, potential win for ad buyers.
How Facebook Makes Its Money Back
Just like with any bidding war, the items in higher demand are worth more money depending on how much large companies are willing to pay. These data providers know which segments are more attractive, and they charge accordingly - you can be sure they won't be taking a financial hit in spite of eliminating the bidding war. Instead, Facebook has decided to pay this financial burden. So how could this possibly be worth it to Facebook?
The old model of the bidding war typically resulted in data costs that end up squeezing out the smaller companies with less to spend. Not only do you have to compete with bigger pockets, but you have to make sure that you don't spend your entire advertising budget just bidding for the data; you still have to pay for the ads in order to actually use the data. And smaller businesses don't have the budget to do broad canvas advertising. While seemingly altruistic, this model has definite benefits for Facebook, which can be easily summed up:
Categories vs. Segments
Just like with certain segments, certain categories will be more popular, but under this new category system, the ad rate - not the cost of data - is what fluctuates. Companies will no longer be pushed out by a bidding war; they will have the option to use their money on a different, but still relevant (and less expensive) category. Regardless, marketers must remember that skipping the bidding war does not mean that all categories are accessible to everyone.
The bottom line is that the categories system will allow for more specific, refined targeting with a much more accurate reach. With partner categories, Facebook eliminates too-broad targeting and helps ensure that the category you belong to is relevant. This should be an immediate win for Facebook. Ultimately, however, small businesses may turn out to be the big winners in the end.
Image on home page via Shutterstock.
Join the Industry's Leading eCommerce & Direct Marketing Experts in Chicago
ClickZ Live Chicago (Nov 3-6) will deliver over 50 sessions across 4 days and 10 individual tracks, including Data-Driven Marketing, Social, Mobile, Display, Search and Email. Check out the full agenda and register by Friday, Oct 3 to take advantage of Early Bird Rates!
Andrea Fishman, VP of strategy and a partner at BGT Partners, leads BGT's Chicago office and has extensive experience in marketing and management consulting. She and her team drive value to BGT's clients through the development of behavioral marketing programs, web analytics, measurement programs, industry benchmarking, competitive assessments, and the design of integrated marketing programs.
Andrea has been with BGT since 2003 and is credited with strengthening partnerships with such clients as ADT, Sony, ADP, and Avaya. Prior to joining BGT, she served as global vice president at divine, inc. She's also held strategic positions within marchFIRST, The Lewin Group, and the office of U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy.
A graduate of Brandeis University, Fishman was awarded the Wasserman Scholarship for academic achievement and was named a 2010 Stevie Awards Finalist as Best Executive in a Service Business. She is a frequent judge for the eHealthcare Leadership Awards and is involved with the Special Olympics and Chicago Cares, a community service organization.
IBM Social Analytics: The Science Behind Social Media Marketing
80% of internet users say they prefer to connect with brands via Facebook. 65% of social media users say they use it to learn more about brands, products and services. Learn about how to find more about customers' attitudes, preferences and buying habits from what they say on social media channels.
An Introduction to Marketing Attribution: Selecting the Right Model for Search, Display & Social Advertising
If you're considering implementing a marketing attribution model to measure and optimize your programs, this paper is a great introduction. It also includes real-life tips from marketers who have successfully implemented attribution in their organizations.
October 23, 2014
1:00pm ET/10:00am PT