When Bad Things Happen to Good Partnerships

  |  May 6, 2013   |  Comments

How to keep your pro services organization from discord and debilitation.

Today I take a brief recess from directly addressing actionable analytics in order to discuss a topic that will resonate with anyone who runs a small business, especially in the professional services arena.

This will include lots of folks in the analytics space, as analytics in general requires lots of smart-human involvement to make it deliver on many of the promises made by application vendors.

One thing I have learned over the years is that it's very possible to witness many different ramifications of both wonderful and bad partner behavior. Wonderful behavior is dull to talk about, so I won't.

But bad behavior is interesting, especially the kind that hurts analytics businesses and ultimately their customers. This is why we read novels filled with mayhem: there's something fascinating about chaos, even if we want to avoid it.

In that light, here are some lessons I've learned:

Be Careful Whom You Partner With

There are lots of dishonest people in the world. Some of them are even professionals in the analytics space! Some of these may even be both entrepreneurs and sociopaths. You know what some sociologists have said about senior management and sociopathy (there's noticeable overlap) - so for the more analytics-oriented among us, it's important to note there's actually data to suggest that egregious behavior might be worth looking out for.

Once upon a time there was a (hypothetical) consulting company with three partners. The company operated for several years without an operating agreement (OA), which, if you do not know, is a binding set of rules by which the partners must abide, else be punished in a variety of carefully detailed ways.

Then one day two of the partners presented the third partner (at long last) with an operating agreement of a fairly stringent nature. Feeling as if it were a boon to the partnership that they should have a fairly stringent OA, he had no problem signing it.

Not much more than a year later, the first two partners decided they did not like the OA and that instead of abiding by the rules they had devised, they would simply defy every rule they didn't care for, and deride the rest as "defective." The attorney who wrote it for them naturally took exception, as they had carefully devised it with his collaboration. Their goal was to dissolve a profitable company because they didn't want to be partners with number three anymore - but refused to go about it in the way that was carefully laid out in the OA. Indicative of how desperate they became, at one point they surreptitiously withdrew from the bank all the company funds and hid them in an effort to force negotiation on their terms.

A long and costly lawsuit followed. Only lawyers win lawsuits, whereas plaintiffs and defendants almost always both lose at the same time.

The moral of this story is: contracts (like operating agreements) are only as worthwhile as the parties signing them.

It may astonish the reader how often bad actors simply ignore their contractual obligations and force the offended party to spend money trying (usually in vain) to get them to comply. More often than not, and especially in small businesses, they get away with it. So it pays to know the characters of your partners, rather than just their signatures.

Not All Business Is Good Business: Getting Free From the Toxic Client

You've agreed on an analytics project. You've agreed on a price. You feel like you have a good understanding of how you are going to achieve success - and how you are going to show value. You've done it before and it has always worked.

But not in this case.

This client cannot be satisfied.

You start to hear things like: "We don't think you did your work. We don't understand how this helps us. Show us one more time and we might be satisfied."

You've already gone several extra miles and they're still churlish. Maybe they don't even pay you (actually, non-payers should be broken out as a separate sort of demon, because they can also be very nice to you while picking your pocket).

Eventually this client becomes a no-win time-suck. And it isn't because you didn't deliver what you said you would deliver. Most likely the client has problems that have nothing to do with you.

For instance, their company may be in serious trouble and they are not thinking straight. Or, their job may be in serious trouble and they are hoping that if they can heap enough blame on somebody else, they can avoid getting fired. Or, they are impervious to facts and never intended to accept your work.

Some of the signs you should be looking to disengage are as follows:

  • Receding goalposts: every time you meet one requirement, there's a new one you've never heard of before but which has suddenly become essential (perhaps because it just occurred to them, and new ideas have a way of seeming important).
  • Fundamental misconceptions: for instance, an unfounded belief that reporting systems are the exact equivalent of natural language, real-time answers to any business question that seems fancy at the moment; or a complete and utter failure to understand the nature of statistics and trends.
  • A debilitating hunt for self-serving "success" metrics, even as the data seems to suggest "failure."
  • Most important: they have lost respect for your expertise.

The moral of this story is: you should assess your customers as carefully as they assess you - because it's a partnership!

The moment they doubt your domain authority, you can only look for diminished returns. Of course, we are assuming here that you are in fact delivering what you said you would. And if this is the case and you know it, yet it's unrecognized by the customer, then it's time to cut the cord. You'll feel much lighter without that anchor around your ankle.

Image on home page via Shutterstock.


ClickZ Live Chicago Join the Industry's Leading eCommerce & Direct Marketing Experts in Chicago
ClickZ Live Chicago (Nov 3-6) will deliver over 50 sessions across 4 days and 10 individual tracks, including Data-Driven Marketing, Social, Mobile, Display, Search and Email. Check out the full agenda and register by Friday, Oct 3 to take advantage of Early Bird Rates!


Andrew Edwards

Andrew is a digital marketing executive with 20 years' experience servicing the enterprise customer. Currently he is Managing Partner at Efectyv Digital, a digital marketing consulting company, and Managing Partner at Technology Leaders, a web analytics consulting firm he founded in 2002. He combines extensive technical knowledge with a broad strategic understanding of digital marketing and especially digital measurement, plus hands-on creative in the form of the written word, user-experience and traditional design.

His practice is dedicated to building customers' digital marketing success and helping them save money during the process.

He is a writer, a public speaker and a visual artist as well.

He writes a regular column about analytics for ClickZ, the 2013 Online Publisher of the Year. He wrote the groundbreaking "Dawn of Convergence Analytics" report which was featured at the SES show in New York, and the second report in the series will be featured at the same show in San Francisco.

In addition to speaking at SES, he has presented at eMetrics; and his session was voted one of the top ten presentations at the DMA show in Las Vegas. He is speaking again at the DMA in Chicago in the fall of 2013.

In 2004 Andrew co-founded the Digital Analytics Association and is currently a Director Emeritus. He has designed analytics training curricula for business teams and has led seminars on digital marketing subjects.

He was also an adjunct professor at The Pratt Institute where he taught Advanced Computer Graphics for three years. Andrew is also an award-winning, nationally exhibited painter.

COMMENTSCommenting policy

comments powered by Disqus

Get the ClickZ Analytics newsletter delivered to you. Subscribe today!



Featured White Papers

IBM: Social Analytics - The Science Behind Social Media Marketing

IBM Social Analytics: The Science Behind Social Media Marketing
80% of internet users say they prefer to connect with brands via Facebook. 65% of social media users say they use it to learn more about brands, products and services. Learn about how to find more about customers' attitudes, preferences and buying habits from what they say on social media channels.

Marin Software: The Multiplier Effect of Integrating Search & Social Advertising

The Multiplier Effect of Integrating Search & Social Advertising
Latest research reveals 68% higher revenue per conversion for marketers who integrate their search & social advertising. In addition to the research results, this whitepaper also outlines 5 strategies and 15 tactics you can use to better integrate your search and social campaigns.



    • Digital Marketing Analyst
      Digital Marketing Analyst (GovLoop) - Washington D.C.Are you passionate about audience acquisition? Love effective copy and amazingly effective...
    • Product Specialist
      Product Specialist (Agora Inc. ) - BaltimoreDescription: The Product Specialist is hyper-focused on the customer experience and ensures that our...
    • Partnerships Senior Coordinator
      Partnerships Senior Coordinator (, Inc.) - Las VegasZappos IP, Inc. is looking for a Partnerships Senior Coordinator! Why join us? Our...