Eighteen months ago, we launched GroupM Next. At the same time, I decided that after years of playing the part of a road warrior, I should focus a bit more on the warrior part and less on the rubber tire look the road can bring about. Since then, I've realized there's a lot brands can learn from a person's fitness journey.
I set an unofficial weight goal and began a six-day-a-week weight program with a co-worker. Over time, I became almost maniacal about my morning workouts, religiously there at six a.m. on weekdays when in town and whenever and wherever I could find a gym on the road.
My personal preference is heavy weight routines, so hotel gyms are simply not an option; I've become an expert at finding gyms with daily guest privileges in just about every city. Last week, I set a new personal best by squatting a little more than twice my new body weight.
But lifting wasn't enough. Last April, I gave up soda, a personal favorite. After consuming 32oz of "diet" drinks daily, I quit. Cold turkey. I haven't had a drop since.
But even that wasn't enough, so I started running. Some people are natural runners. Others (like myself) run out of a sense of necessity. I do not enjoy running, but I do it anyway. Of all the parts of my journey, this has been the most painful. When I started running, I measured success by completing a 5K run. Sometime last fall, I started to run sprint miles before working out, then running three to four miles on lift days, to increase my metabolism and prevent the common post-lift soreness on leg workout days.
In December, I ran a sub-seven minute mile.
Even still, that wasn't enough for me. So last fall, I got a Nike FuelBand. Once a week, I am asked what it is and what I think about it. My answer is always the same. As a proxy for achievement, it does the job. I sit in meetings, on conference calls and airplanes frequently, so having a visual reminder of my progress (or lack thereof) attached to my wrist is valuable. At one point, I went on an 88-day stretch of achieving my 3,000 point/day goal.
And then something happened: I hit the silent weight goal I'd set for myself. Ten percent of me was gone in terms of total pounds. The lifting program and supplements likely meant even more body fat had vanished, but I realized I was not sophisticated enough in what I was measuring.
I knew my top line goal had been met, but I then plateaued. At some point, despite all the lifting, better eating and running, I simply leveled off on the weight loss. That was fine, but with it came a loss of focus.
If I could sustain this, I would be both happy and surprisingly, less motivated.
I changed the game, so to speak, by shifting my focus from daily weigh-ins at the gym to quarterly body fat analyses. By understanding my percentage of body fat and composition, I could start to refine my approach. The first test was shocking; I had a mental idea of where I was and the reality was not nearly as positive. Yes, it was much better than if I had started testing at this level last year, but it showed just how much more potential for improvement existed.
As marketers, I think there's a lesson in here. We all have goals. In the beginning, we set arbitrary measures to work against, then as we get more data, we refine the goals. But at some stage, the way we measure has to be revisited. At some point, the bar you set can only change if you change what you measure at a more granular level.
I recently returned home from two weeks on the road to find a new and noticeable weight drop. As gratifying as it is, it's an effect caused by the shift in measurement. I firmly believe that without changing what I am now measuring as success, this would not have been possible.
Is your brand measuring the same things they did two, three or five years ago? Are you looking for deeper, more precise metrics, or are you satisfied with good enough at a top level?
Brand fitness, like personal fitness, is a choice, but it's one that is easy to make and hard to keep. Are you making the right choices for you and the health of your brand?
Meet Your Favorite ClickZ Contributors
Many of ClickZ's leading expert contributors will be at ClickZ Live, the new online and digital marketing event kicking off in New York (March 31-April 3). Hear from the likes of: Jeremy Hull, Lisa Raehsler, Andrew Goodman, Bryan Eisenberg, Mathew Sweezey, Aaron Kahlow, Stephanie Miller, Simms Jenkins, Jeanne S. Jennings, Dave Hendricks and more!
Chris Copeland is chief executive officer of GroupM Next, the forward-looking, media innovation unit of GroupM. Chris is responsible for curating and communicating insight-focused media solutions across established and emerging platforms. Leveraging his multi-year experience with emerging media companies, Chris is tasked with stewarding GroupM Next in partnership with agency leadership from GroupM's four media marketing and marketing service agencies (Maxus, MEC, MediaCom, and Mindshare).
Guiding the Predictive Insights, Technology, Education, Research, and Communications teams at GroupM Next, Chris is responsible for overseeing the amplification of insights into opportunities that directly benefit the business of GroupM agencies and their clients. GroupM is the world's largest media investment management group and the media holding arm of WPP.
Chris was selected to lead GroupM Next after nine years of leading the search marketing practice within GroupM. Among his accomplishments include the development and integration of the global search marketing offering for GroupM agencies, GroupM Search, which manages $1.3 billion in search billings globally and has grown to more than 1,000 search marketing strategists serving 40 countries.
Chris is an active member on advisory boards at the 4A's, Google, Yahoo, MSN, and I-COM. He is a frequent speaker in global forums discussing the digital marketplace, and contributes editorial commentary regularly to Advertising Age, ClickZ, MediaPost, and MediaBizBloggers.com.
March 19, 2014