23-dec-2013-unsub

Email Performance Testing: Look at the Trees – and the Forest

  |  December 23, 2013   |  Comments

In email testing, many marketers tend to focus on the trees, not the entire forest. Columnist Jeanne Jennings shares insight from a client case study.

Testing is great. I love testing; one of the reasons I love e-mail is all the data you get. There's so much information on how readers are interacting with your message, much more than you get from postal direct mail.

When you're doing e-mail testing, many people (myself included) tend to focus on the trees, not the forest. It's about the results of that specific send or, in the case of triggered messages, the days or weeks it takes to get statistically significant results. But a recent client experience reminded me that it's important to look at the bigger picture.

For this client, we're testing welcome messages; the welcome message is sent immediately when a person signs up to receive e-mail. Regular readers of this column will know that a welcome message is a transactional message - which means that it typically garners much higher open rates than a standard promotional message.

The primary goal of the testing was to reduce the spam complaint rate (the list is 100 percent opt-in, but prior to this engagement this metric was at a dangerous level). Secondarily the client is looking to:

  • Decrease their unsubscribe rate.
  • Increase customer interaction with the e-mail (read: opens and clicks).
  • Maintain or grow the 'revenue generated per e-mail assumed delivered' figure.

This is a tall order. But I digress.

We've done four tests to date. None of our test versions has bested the control, meaning that the control has been the same throughout. It's a frustrating situation when nothing is able to beat the control, and that always gnaws at me, but there was more here that was bothering me.

I finally figured it out when I pulled the metrics for just the control version. I can't share the actual data with you (client confidentiality), but let me share a few of the extremes.

Remember the primary reason we were testing? It was the spam complaint rate, which was at a dangerous level where blacklisting becomes a possibility.

23-dec-2013-spam

Over the course of testing the spam complaint rate on the control e-mail, which was same throughout, fell by half a percentage point, a decrease of 325 percent. I wish I could tell you that our testing had something to do with this, but I can't; since the creative was the same across all sends there must have been external factors at play which caused the decrease.

The unsubscribe rate also fluctuated, but just by 43 percent, which was a variance of one percentage point. It's interesting to note that while spam complaints went consistently down, the unsubscribe rate has a steady upward trend except for Test 3, where it decreases.

23-dec-2013-unsub

Remember, we'll be looking at the same welcome message creative, sent to new subscribers, over a 5 month period.

Revenue per e-mail assumed delivered also fluctuated during this period, to the tune of $17 or 107 percent. This metric wasn't tracked for the first two months, so this fluctuation happened in just a three month period.

23-dec-2013-revenue
We saw similar variances in:

  • Deliverability, 32 percentage points, 47 percent.
  • Open Rate, 5 percentage points, 31 percent.
  • Click-through Rate, 4 percentage points, 54 percent.
  • Click-to-Open Rate, 14 percentage points, 27 percent.

So here's the end game. None of this negates the A/B split test results we got from our testing. But it does negate the results from the first test (where we compared the test results, sent in month three, to the control results from month 2). And it raises the concern that what performs well this month cannot be counted on to do as well next month (see the revenue results for an extreme example).

So what's the moral of the story? Look at your test results in terms of the forest as well as the trees. If there are large variations in performance on the same creative from send to send, explore what other factors are impacting performance -- and work to optimize those as well as your creative to boost your bottom line results over the long term.

And if you found this article informative, join me at EEC14 and attend my pre-conference workshop; use code SPK50 to save $50 on your registration fee.

Until next time,
Jeanne

ClickZ Live Chicago Learn Digital Marketing Insights From Leading Brands!
ClickZ Live Chicago (Nov 3-6) will deliver over 50 sessions across 10 individual tracks, including Data-Driven Marketing, Social, Mobile, Display, Search and Email. Check out the full agenda, or register and attend one of the best ClickZ events yet!

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jeanne Jennings

Jeanne Jennings is one of the World's Top 50 Email Marketing Influencers (Vocus, 2014). She has more than 20 years of experience in the email and online marketing and product development world. Jeanne's direct-response approach to email strategy, tactics, and creative direction helps organizations make their email marketing initiatives more effective and more profitable. Clients include: ConsumerReports.org, FDANews, Hasbro, PRWeb, Scholastic, Verizon, and WeightWatchers. Want to learn more? Check out her blog.

COMMENTSCommenting policy

comments powered by Disqus

Get ClickZ Email newsletters delivered right to your inbox. Subscribe today!

COMMENTS

UPCOMING EVENTS

UPCOMING TRAINING

Featured White Papers

Google My Business Listings Demystified

Google My Business Listings Demystified
To help brands control how they appear online, Google has developed a new offering: Google My Business Locations. This whitepaper helps marketers understand how to use this powerful new tool.

5 Ways to Personalize Beyond the Subject Line

5 Ways to Personalize Beyond the Subject Line
82 percent of shoppers say they would buy more items from a brand if the emails they sent were more personalized. This white paper offer five tactics that will personalize your email beyond the subject line and drive real business growth.

WEBINARS

    Information currently unavailable

Resources

Jobs

    • Executive Assistant
      Executive Assistant (Agora Inc. ) - BaltimoreAgora Inc., an international publishing company, located in the Mt. Vernon district of Baltimore, MD...
    • Paid Search Specialist
      Paid Search Specialist (Boathouse, Inc.) - Waltham  Boathouse is looking for a Paid Search Specialist to work as a part of the Digital Acquisition...
    • Paid Search / Search Engine Marketing (SEM, PPC) Specialist
      Paid Search / Search Engine Marketing (SEM, PPC) Specialist (HeBS Digital) - New YorkJOB TITLE:     Paid Search / Search Engine Marketing...