Cybersquatters, typo-squatters, and parties who have tacked keywords onto trademark-protected domain names were hit hard this week in two separate rulings by the National Arbitration Forum.
Amazon.com took action against two individuals who had registered domain names it claimed violated its registered trademark. Arbitration was carried out under ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.
One of the individuals, Michele Dinoila of SZK.com, maintained 12 domains that the online retailer claimed bore a “confusing similarity” to Amazon.com. The dozen domains included keyword meshing URLs such as “amazonappliances.com,” typos like “wwwamazon.com,” and a foreign translation of “amazzone.com.” The sites in question contained links to Amazon’s competitors, including BarnesandNoble.com and Booksamillion.com.
Dinoila, based in Italy, is named in more than 20 other decisions and has been called a “recidivist cybersquatter” by Amazon.com.
The second arbitration was held against an unnamed individual operating under the company name Whois Privacy Inc for the registration of the “amazln.com” domain. The respondent did not appear to acknowledge the proceedings. At press time, the site remained active with links to commerce sites and sponsored links.
Rich Polidi, an attorney who practices trademark law with North Carolina’s Stark Law Group, said one challenge in selecting arbitration is the need to demonstrate a party’s bad faith in registering and using the domain name.
“One hurdle in a domain name arbitration, one that is not necessarily present in a court of law, is a need to demonstrate that the respondent has registered and used the domain name in bad faith,” he said.
They're arguably the most annoying video ad formats in existence, but soon they'll be a thing of the past, at least on YouTube.
On Thursday, Twitter reported its earnings for Q4 2016, and the results have raised questions about the company's long-term future.
From its $1.5 billion air cargo hub to its growing network of contract last-mile delivery drivers, Amazon is increasingly looking like a logistics company; but shipping and logistics giant FedEx isn't sitting idly by.
Havas Group's Meaningful Brands report delivers sobering news for brands: consumers wouldn't care if 74% of the brands they use disappeared off the face of the earth.