There are a lot of possible reasons why a consumer would abandon a shopping cart in the middle of an online purchase: a sudden stock decline wipes out his finances, a friend gives him a gift of very same item he is buying, or the blue screen of death displays on his computer. These are all good explanations (except for the blue screen, which is inexcusable), but no consumer should ever abandon a purchase because your site kept the total purchase price hidden until the last moment or because your checkout process is too cumbersome. Yet those are exactly the reasons consumers give for leaving!
As Yogi Berra said, “It’s like déjà vu all over again.” I’ve gone over this ground before, but apparently the message is not getting out.
According to Vividence, 75 percent of online shoppers abandon their shopping carts before buying. Below are some of the main reasons given.
Seventy-two percent mentioned “high shipping prices.” This is a valid reason, as some shipping prices are ridiculous, but consumers should be given that information up front. It should not be cause for jumping ship in the middle of a purchase. If your state has a high sales tax, you don’t abandon the checkout line and leave the store. Why? Because you already know about it.
Forty-three percent said they abandoned the cart because the “total cost of their purchase was too high.” “Merely browsing or comparison shopping” was mentioned by 61 percent. This is a valid reason; consumers should be permitted to gather information and shop around. Fifty-six percent said they “changed their mind about the purchase.” This is also fine; buyer’s remorse hits some people sooner than others.
However, other reasons given were “checkout process was too long” (41 percent), “too much personal information was required” (35 percent), “site [was] unstable or unreliable” (31 percent), and “checkout process [was] confusing” (27 percent). These are not acceptable. If I came at you with a bag of money, would you send me on a scavenger hunt before you took it? We must let our customers do what they need to do in a quick, easy fashion.
Datamonitor calculated that online retailers will lose $13.5 billion this year due to poor online customer service. The company estimated that 69.4 percent of online shopping carts are abandoned and cited many familiar reasons (slow order processing, security concerns, and shipping costs). The researchers found, though, that 8 percent of the transactions were abandoned simply because consumers couldn’t get questions answered while they were buying. In the real world, we always have the chance to ask one last question of the salesclerk before we swipe our credit card. It should not be surprising that we need this in the online world as well.
Basex also believes this to be true. The company’s analysts calculate that online retailers could increase sales by up to 20 percent, or $20 billion every year, if they deployed instant messaging as an online customer service tool. I’ve mentioned this before. Consumers want to talk to real people, and when they’re making a purchase, they really need to. Though instant messaging itself may not be necessary, an equivalent investment in quality service is.
Or… you could continue losing about 70 percent of every near sale. It’s your choice.
President Trump's digital savvy isn't limited to social media. As it turns out, the Trump Organization owns thousands of domain names, possibly even more than 10,000.
Silicon Valley loves fancy job titles. It’s just something we do, and software and technology lend themselves to it. But it’s not always helpful.
In an often fragmented workplace, where various departments have varying opinions and goals, it can be challenging to get everyone on the same page and make strategy meetings productive.
In part one a few weeks ago, we discussed what brand TLDs (top level domains) are, which brands are applying for them and why they might be important. Today, we’ll take an in-depth look at the potential benefits for brands, and explore the challenges brand TLDs could help solve.