Keeping an Eye on Google

A new report offers fascinating, in-depth insights on how users interact with Google search results, based on eye-tracking technology studies.

A new report offers fascinating, in-depth insights on how users interact with Google search results, based on studies using eye-tracking technology.

The report, from Enquiro, Did-it, and Eyetools, is a comprehensive white paper that builds on an earlier press release that describes Google’s “golden triangle” of search results.

The study finds most viewers look at results in an “F” shaped scan pattern, with the eye traveling vertically along the far left side of the results seeking visual cues (relevant words, brands, etc.), then scanning to the right, as if something caught the participant’s attention.

This new study expands significantly on the initial findings. It offers a detailed look at the methodology used and reaches much more granular conclusions regarding all aspects of Google search results. The study shows, for example, searchers react to organic results differently than to sponsored listings.

An interesting twist comes into play when a query triggers a “one-box” result, with news, local search, or desktop search results displayed at the top of a search results page above organic listings. The report raises a very interesting question: If we can’t always control Google’s behavior when one-box results are triggered, is trying to achieve top organic listings worth the premium in both time and cost?

Throughout the report, sidebars offer insights into searcher behavior observed during the study. These are the authors’ opinions, based on both study results and their experience as search marketing professionals. Some of the insights touch on such issues as why we ignore advertising, the role of brand in search, online patience, the effects of gender, and numerous others.

One of the most interesting parts of the report describes “semantic mapping,” an important new idea that, when used properly, will help search marketers optimize pages more effectively, not for the search engine but for the ultimate “consumers” of search results: people.

The idea behind semantic mapping is when we search, we’re not just seeking for the “best” results but rather the best match between an online destination and the concept in our minds. This goes far beyond the notion of landing a page with keywords or keyword phrases that match search queries.

Instead, the study finds searchers tend to respond to search results that do the best job of matching the concept in the searcher’s mind, regardless of the position of the search result on the page. Two important behavioral events occur here: Our eyes jump around on search results pages looking for direct matches; we also use peripheral vision, which can indirectly help locate information on the page.

These ideas, optimizing for concepts rather than keywords and taking advantage of subtler types of behavior such as the searcher’s peripheral vision, could lead to a whole new level of search optimization for search marketers willing to invest the time to experiment.

The study also examines many other factors influencing searcher behavior, such as the effects of bold-faced search terms rather than plain ones in results; the confidence factor a searcher has with initial results compared to results seen more than once; demographic differences that can affect searcher preferences, and many more.

It’s a fascinating report. Though it deals with some very sophisticated research and presents rather complex observations and conclusions, it’s nonetheless compelling and eminently readable. If you’re serious about search marketing, you should get this study. It contains both solid research and valuable insights into how to improve search marketing you won’t find elsewhere.

Priced at $149, the report isn’t inexpensive and it will likely pay for itself almost immediately if you put its keen insights and practical recommendations into action with your own search marketing efforts.

For more information, and a sample of the full report, visit www.enquiro.com/eyetrackingreport.asp.

Join us for Search Engine Strategies August 8-11 in San Jose, CA.

Want more search information? ClickZ SEM Archives contain all our search columns, organized by topic.

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Whitepapers

US Mobile Streaming Behavior
Whitepaper | Mobile

US Mobile Streaming Behavior

5y

US Mobile Streaming Behavior

Streaming has become a staple of US media-viewing habits. Streaming video, however, still comes with a variety of pesky frustrations that viewers are ...

View resource
Winning the Data Game: Digital Analytics Tactics for Media Groups
Whitepaper | Analyzing Customer Data

Winning the Data Game: Digital Analytics Tactics for Media Groups

5y

Winning the Data Game: Digital Analytics Tactics f...

Data is the lifeblood of so many companies today. You need more of it, all of which at higher quality, and all the meanwhile being compliant with data...

View resource
Learning to win the talent war: how digital marketing can develop its people
Whitepaper | Digital Marketing

Learning to win the talent war: how digital marketing can develop its peopl...

2y

Learning to win the talent war: how digital market...

This report documents the findings of a Fireside chat held by ClickZ in the first quarter of 2022. It provides expert insight on how companies can ret...

View resource
Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Experience Economy
Report | Digital Transformation

Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Experience Economy

1m

Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Exp...

Customers decide fast, influenced by only 2.5 touchpoints – globally! Make sure your brand shines in those critical moments. Read More...

View resource