Today, e-mail relevancy is being powered by privacy. “What?” you ask. That doesn’t make much sense. What does one have to do with the other? Many of you out there today might fear the practice of privacy. You might think that by asking for permission or giving options to customers, you will lose customers or database size (quantity over quality). But that just isn’t the case.
The anti-spam community and many marketing experts have preached the ideals of relevancy within your e-mail campaigns for years, and rightfully so. Relevancy, or targeting of e-mails, can sometimes reduce the heartache of the recipient, reducing their propensity to hit the “This is SPAM” button. Those, like myself, who have preached the relevancy mantra can usually show better delivery rates. Much of that relevancy can be done using behavioral metrics such as open, click-through, website visits, etc. But did you know that it also comes from the process of privacy as well?
When you define it, privacy is the ability of an individual or group to control information about themselves from becoming known to people other than those they chose to give the information to. It is a fundamental human right and a cornerstone of a democratic society in many countries. It lies at the foundation of the rule of law, the secret ballot, doctor-patient confidentiality, lawyer-client privilege, the notion of private property, and the value our society places on the autonomy of the individual. Things like names, addresses, phone numbers, financial data, and e-mail addresses all can be defined in some way as personally identifiable information (PII) by many privacy frameworks.
To make things much more interesting, countries like Canada (PIPEDA) and groups like the European Union (Directive 95/46/EC) have explicit opt-in requirements to process PII. This year, the U.S. is even considering having a federal law or federal framework requiring explicit opt-in as well. Many of your clients are also not just in the U.S., but have operations around the world in countries that have this legal requirement.
CRM systems and marketing process all come down to how the audience reacts to your campaigns. Yes, you can monitor the consumer’s digital body language
Permission (privacy) should be at the cornerstone of every marketing process at every business today. Not only because it might be a requirement soon, but because it powers the relevancy of your message from the beginning, and impacts how your e-mail deliverability will move forward. Consumers are not afraid to dump your brand if they feel their needs are not being met, or if they feel threatened by loss of their PII. If you send the customer what they asked for (and gave permission for), then you are giving the relationship a good start. When you get permission, you have the ability to get more relevant targeting information about users, including demographics and the types of information they want.
Privacy should not be feared, but embraced. It helps ensure that the right information at the right time and to the right individual is sent out.
It's easy to think of customers as fish you can bait with discounts. It's also lazy. Marketers should adopt the B2B mentality of solving customers' problems.
Amazon is well-known for sending emails just for you. But a business doesn't have to be Amazon-sized to successfully deploy the same strategy.
Instead of launching a fully-formed new program, try innovating in increments, where you make a series of small changes that eventually add up to something big.
Toy retailer The Entertainer recently reported some impressive figures, including 120% growth in mobile sales and a tripling of its email revenue. ... read more