More NewsCourt Lifts Restraining Order Against Juno

Court Lifts Restraining Order Against Juno

A federal judge declined NetZero's motion to extend a restraining order leveled at Juno in January.

Juno Online Services Inc. won a victory against arch-rival NetZero Inc. in federal court Thursday, as a judge lifted a restraining order that kept the NY-based ISP from displaying third-party ads on its Juno Guide floating ad banner.

NetZero filed a lawsuit against Juno in late December, charging the company with patent infringement over a technology that enables an Internet service provider to display advertisements or messages through a window that is separate from the browser. NetZero claimed it was the exclusive licensee of the patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,157,946. Juno promptly responded with a counter-suit, alleging that it was in fact NetZero that was infringing on its patented ad-banner technology.

But in January the cards seemed to be falling NetZero’s way when Judge Stephen V. Wilson of the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles granted its motion for a temporary restraining order which prevented Juno from using its ad banner technology. The order kept Juno from using the technology to serve ads through most of the first quarter.

But on Thursday, Judge Wilson not only refused NetZero’s request for a preliminary injunction to broaden and extend the restraining order, he lifted it entirely.

The court determined that NetZero’s patent claims are vulnerable to attack on grounds of invalidity and non-infringement when a full trial is conducted later this year.

“By denying NetZero’s request for a preliminary injunction, the court sends an important signal that it has doubts that the ‘946’ patent will stand up at trial,” said Richard Buchband, senior vice president and general counsel of Juno. “We’re encouraged by today’s ruling and believe that it is a good barometer of Juno’s chances for prevailing at trial.”

NetZero declined to comment.

Meanwhile, during the course of the restraining order, Juno President and Chief Executive Officer Charles Ardai maintained that the company’s inability to serve ads was not hurting the company because the majority of its revenue was from billable subscribers.

Related Articles

GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

Data & Analytics GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

3w Clark Boyd
What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

Legal & Regulatory What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

8m Al Roberts
Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

Media Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

8m Al Roberts
Is Twitter slowly dying?

More News Is Twitter slowly dying?

9m Al Roberts
FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

Ecommerce FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

9m Al Roberts
Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

Ecommerce Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

8m Al Roberts
YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

More News YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

9m Al Roberts
YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

Ad Industry Metrics YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

9m Al Roberts