Advertising industry leader DoubleClick is facing no fewer than four lawsuits alleging its privacy practices are unlawful, according to documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
All of the suits have been filed over the last two weeks, as the pressure privacy advocates have been placing on DoubleClick (DCLK) has intensified. The legal problems coincide with an email campaign launched by the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), an organization that advocates for privacy.
The concerns center around DoubleClick’s collection of online consumer behavior in “cookies” and its recently-revealed intentions to cross-reference that data with the offline consumer databases it acquired with the purchase of Abacus Direct.
Some of the legal arguments involve issues specific to DoubleClick, because of its Abacus Direct acquisition, but others, because they criticize the company’s collection of data with cookies, may have larger implications for the online advertising industry.
After Harriet Judnick filed suit against the company in Marin County, California, on January 27th, Bruce v. DoubleClick and Healy v. DoubleClick were filed the next day. On February 1, Nancy Donaldson of California filed her suit. The most recent three lawsuits, all of them class action suits, cite federal electronic privacy laws, while the first relies on California law.
At the same time, the CDT mounted an email campaign to some of the Web site publishers that comprise the DoubleClick network. That email barrage asked publishers to refrain from providing DoubleClick with personally identifying information about users of their sites, because it is that data that will allow DoubleClick to match its online and offline data.
The campaign sparked a firestorm of controversy. Publishers, many of whom were themselves confused about how DoubleClick was using cookies, may have received as many as 4,300 emails sent through the CDT Web site. That heavy volume was considered spam, by some, and they felt that they were being wrongly targeted.
The response from publishers, and appeals to its ISP, prompted CDT to disassemble its form letter to DoubleClick network members, although the organization still allows site visitors to email those publishers that haven’t responded to the campaign. Those who did respond, usually with assurances about their intentions to keep members’ personally identifying information from DoubleClick, had their responses posted on the CDT site.
“We share everyone’s concern about maintaining privacy on the Internet,” said Joe Krakoviak, with APBOnline.com. “We are very pleased that they have taken down that portion of their site.”
“[The campaign] was very successful in getting the companies’ attention,” said Ari Schwartz, policy analyst with the CDT.
The lawsuits, meanwhile, have beenpiling up and DoubleClick, in its SEC filing, says they’ve been filed so recently that it hasn’t had a chance to determine their merit.
Bruce v. DoubleClick, filed on January 28, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleges that the company has secretly intercepted users’ personal data and Web surfing habits without Internet users’ consent or proper disclosure, allegedly in violation of Federal electronics privacy statutes. The class action, filed on the behalf of all people in the US whose “private information was secretly intercepted”, seeks damages.
On the same day, Healy v. DoubleClick was filed against the company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges violations of Federal electronics privacy statutes, as well as common law trespass and invasion of privacy. This class action suit was filed on behalf of all users of the Internet.
Donaldson v. DoubleClick was filed February 1st in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint, filed on behalf of everyone who viewed a DoubleClick-placed ad since 1996, alleges that the company illegally used cookies for profiling and tracking Internet users without their knowledge. Donaldson is also seeking an injunction and damages in the case.
Despite the fact that it faces growing competition from Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat, Google-owned YouTube is still one of the most popular ... read more
Amazon prides itself on being the most “customer-centric” company in the world, but according to investigative journalism non-profit ProPublica, Amazon’s algorithms are often anything but ... read more