Duplicate content is one of the most discussed, blogged, and talked about SEO topics – well, after link building, of course. Based on Google’s webmaster guidelines, “Duplicate content generally refers to substantive blocks of content within or across domains that either completely matches other content or is appreciably similar. Most of the time when we see this, it’s unintentional, or at least not malicious in origin.”
What exactly do “substantive” and “appreciably similar” mean? In my view, two pages can be termed “duplicate” if 30 percent or more of the page elements – title, URL, content – are similar to each other. For example, in the news/blog world, articles are often syndicated across numerous websites.
Two types of duplicate content exist: within a domain and cross-domain.
Within a Domain
This kind of duplicate content arises within the same site or domain. The most common example is a scenario like abc.com, where http://abc.com, http://www.abc.com/index.html, and http://www.abc.com all point to the same page. The solution here is simple: 301 redirect http://abc.com and http://www.abc.com/index.html to http://www.abc.com.
Duplicate content issues can also arise when the crawler can get to the same piece of content through two or more different paths. Example: shopzilla.com/digital-cameras/402/canon/259-43010/products and shopzilla.com/digital-cameras/canon+digital+cameras/402/products are very similar. In such cases, Google picks one and discards the other. If you have tons of these types of instances on your site, I suggest using a canonical tag – pick a URL that’s already indexed by Google or is more relevant to users, and have the second URL point to the primary using the canonical tag. This will help in two ways:
- Search engines will know your preferred version and will pick that.
- Search engines will pass link juice from one version to another, thus boosting the link juice of your preferred page.
Here are a few common scenarios where duplicate content arises between domains.
Content syndications: This usually happens when one domain syndicates its content to another domain. The example below shows CNET’s content syndicated on nytimes.com. According to Google, “If you syndicate your content on other sites, Google will always show the version we think is most appropriate for users in each given search, which may or may not be the version you’d prefer.”
In most instances, “most appropriate for users” corresponds to greater page authority. In this case, CNET shows up in the number two spot for the query “Canon PowerShot S90,” while nytimes.com is on page three of the results.
Affiliates and co-brands: Both affiliate and co-brand deals result in duplicate content issues if not done correctly. Although co-brand deals are generally a thing of the past, they do still occur. From an SEO perspective, I would stay very far away from co-brand deals, because they inevitably result in one of the sites being completely removed from the search engine results pages (SERPs).
Here are some things to keep in mind when syndicating your content or starting an affiliate program.
- Have the site on which your content is syndicated link back to you.
- Ask the website syndicating your content to add a “no index” tag to prevent search engines from indexing their version of the content. If you can swing this, you should probably be in business development or sales!
- Keep the syndicated feed different from the content that’s on your site. One way of doing this is to not syndicate all of the content, or have the affiliate site display results in a different order.
- Ensure that the key SEO elements like URL structure and title and meta tags are different between your site and the affiliate.
Removing duplicate content from your own domain is easy, so complete that as soon as you can. Duplicate content across domains is a totally different beast, but if you play by the rules, in most cases, you should be able to tame this beast.
This column was originally published in SES Magazine in July 2010.
According to data gathered for the report,‘Communications Infrastructure: The Backbone of Digital,’ 88% of IT professionals and 61% of marketers ranked their company’s current communication infrastructure as 'cutting-edge' or 'good.'
President Trump's digital savvy isn't limited to social media. As it turns out, the Trump Organization owns thousands of domain names, possibly even more than 10,000.
Silicon Valley loves fancy job titles. It’s just something we do, and software and technology lend themselves to it. But it’s not always helpful.
In an often fragmented workplace, where various departments have varying opinions and goals, it can be challenging to get everyone on the same page and make strategy meetings productive.