The big news: Twitter is raising another $100 million on a valuation of $1 billion! Well I guess that seals it. Twitter is in it for the long haul, declaring its intention to remain a freestanding media company.
But as Bloomberg News reported, “Twitter has yet to report any significant revenue.” So how can it justify that kind of valuation? Let’s put it this way — remember when Google had yet to report any significant revenue?
Twitter attracted 25 million users in August, compared with 2.2 million a year earlier, according to Nielsen. With that kind of groundswell and large database of registered users, the opportunities for highly targeted contextual, demographic, geographic, and behavioral advertising is huge. Twitter could monetize in ways that would be non-intrusive.
Twitter has reached a point where there aren’t many alternatives to the micro-blogging platform. While it’s not impossible for one to emerge, it’s unlikely. People are pretty much wedded to Twitter, plus there are so many complementary applications in use on desktops and mobile devices around the globe. It would be difficult to topple Twitter off the top of the heap anytime soon.
Then there are fears about injecting advertising into a media environment that people enjoy. I always hear, “Well, people don’t like advertising,” or “We did a poll and people said they did not want to see ads.” If you asked television viewers if they wanted to see ads during their favorite show, close to 100 percent would probably say “no.” Now conversely if you asked people if they preferred to have their favorite show with ads or not having their show at all because there was no funding, close to 100 percent would probably take the show with the ads.
The same goes for Twitter. Of course, no one wants it cluttered with ads. But if there were only two choices — Twitter with a way to stay in business or no Twitter — the vast majority of us would choose Twitter with a way for it to stay in business.
The same thing happened with Google, YouTube, and Facebook. Even YouTube has pre-rolls running on certain premium partner channels and I haven’t heard of any huge consumer backlash.
So, I started to think of the different ways I’d monetize Twitter if it were my site. And that includes programs that I’d find valuable as a media buyer.
Here’s my list. Please feel free to add to it:
- Official corporate accounts: Companies that hit a certain threshold of followers could pay a monthly fee for a Twitter account and a per-tweet fee. The per-tweet fee could be super low, something like five cents. The cumulative effect of this alone would be huge! (This has been rumored for some time now.)
- Cost-per-follower engagement ads: Individuals and companies could place follower invitations as discreet ads on the Twitter sidebar. (It would be kind of like Facebook’s “Become a Fan” engagement ads.) The more targeted the follower based on demographics, content, or geography, the more expensive. For example, Best Buy could pay $0.50 per follower for people who signed up (followed) for its Deal-of-the-Day tweets.
- New account follower co-registration: Companies could acquire followers during the Twitter signup process before those new users are following tons of other companies and people. Twitter could simply offer “do you want to follow these accounts” as quick check boxes as a last step in the signup process based on profile info and bio descriptions. Just like standard newsletter co-reg. The options would be very limited and targeted based on the new user information. Many companies would be willing to pay $1 per follower for these Twitter newbies.
- Dashboards and analytics: Brands could pay for dashboards, alerts reporting mentions of their brands and products, and blinded demographic and geographic info on who was talking about them.
- Crowdsourcing and polls: How about a Twitter forum/question of the day section by topic? People answer your questions and their answers show up as a tweet in their account, thereby promoting the question or poll. Pollsters would also be able to pay to get demographic info and promote the poll.
- Links and custom templates: Give people and companies more options to in terms of what they do with the background and bio real estate. For example, let companies pay $100 per month to customize certain portions of their page more. People may be willing to pay it as well.
- Custom events: OK, so Twitter is already experimenting with this. But you first you have to have an event!
- Targeted ads: Twitter could do very targeted text or buttons at the bottom and sides of the pages. And it could charge based on CPC (define) or CPM (define). These ads could be targeted by content, registration information, geography, and more. After the initial shock, people will accept it.
Every leading Internet phenomenon entity, whether it was Google, YouTube, or Facebook, had to get over their fear of user pushback. They all had to do things that would drive revenue and take care of their overhead. Typically, the results have been very positive for their users.
Google could afford to offer free services, applications, software, and more. Could Google have done this without revenue? Same with Facebook. Could it afford the long-term infrastructure to support all those free applications and interactions between people without revenue?
Just think of all the cool things Twitter might do. At the very least, it will be able to afford an infrastructure that doesn’t crash or block users when they get too busy.
27-year-old Swede Felix Kjellberg, who goes by the name PewDiePie on YouTube, has found himself at the center of a firestorm.
The explosive growth of video in 2016 makes 2017 an important year for video content and as more publishers are tempted to use it, it’s useful to consider the best strategies to maximise its effectiveness.
Apple has announced that with the next update to iOS 10, they will limit the number of times an app owner can pester a user for a rating.
2017 will be a watershed moment for video, as consumption moves from the TV to other devices.