Officials at the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) confirmed Wednesday the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) will announce arrests and indictments of several alleged American spammers at a press conference Thursday in Washington, D.C.
The DMA said some of those arrests were the result of Operation Slam Spam, a partnership between the DMA and the FBI, which launched in August 2003. The New York-based industry organization provides funding, training for law enforcement officials and a database full of known spammers.
“It’s about time, because the majority of spam that we get is just egregiously illegal,” said John Levine, chairman of the Anti-Spam Research Group (ASRG). “I’m glad to see they finally collected enough stuff that they’re ready to move ahead and put these guys in jail where they belong.”
The DMA for years has been working on ways to separate its organization, which promotes the legal dissemination of commercial emails, from a spam community, which blasts out millions of illegal unsolicited commercial emails (UCE) monthly. Many of those use spoofed
In its statement, the DMA said its work with the FBI “helps engender greater trust and comfort in legitimate commercial email communications.”
It is likely the spammers will be charged with violating provisions of the CAN-SPAM Act, legislation enacted in January to respond to the growing threat of spam, which is perpetuated many times by people located in the United States who host their operations overseas where anti-spam laws aren’t as strictly enforced.
The CAN-SPAM Act says people and businesses can send emails, as long as they abide by the constraints: They must include a valid IP address; contain an electronics-based opt-out mechanism; indicate in the subject line that it is an advertisement; and include a legitimate physical mailing address.
It’s likely the alleged perpetrators will also be charged under anti-fraud laws that pre-dated CAN-SPAM. Before the legislation passed, the DMA had long maintained that much spam was already illegal under existing federal statutes.
In the past eight months, the new law has had little effect on spamming activity. A recent report by security firm CipherTrust illustrates that 86 percent of the spam sent between May and July originated in the United States. A Senate Commerce Committee hearing in May found wildly different opinions on the effectiveness of the legislation, while only a few arrests have actually been made since the bill’s passage. The first CAN-SPAM cases didn’t occur until March and April.
It might be a little early to worry about the effectiveness of the fledgling bill, however. Levine said that although it’s easy enough to see the numbers of fraudulent spam, getting the FBI or DOJ to provide evidence of guilt on a particular person or business is another thing entirely.
“It’s a very new part of law enforcement, and, as a result, building a case is going to be difficult,” he said. “They’re going to have complicated, technical evidence, and they’re going to have to educate the judges as to why this evidence actually support the case and these guys are violating this new law.”
A spokesman for the DOJ declined to comment. A spokesman at the FBI’s cybercrime division was not immediately available for comment.
A class action lawsuit against an internet-connected pleasure device highlights the potential pitfalls a growing number of companies will face as they embrace ... read more
Google sparked a small firestorm last week as reports surfaced that its intelligent assistant device Google Home delivered an unsolicited advertisement to unsuspecting owners.
According to Internet Retailer's newly released The Best Digital Marketers in E-Commerce report, Target is the most effective marketer in online retail. So why is it struggling overall?
The rise of YouTube and digital video generally has a lot to do with the rise of the internet and the abundance of digital video content. But YouTube's ascendency is also the result of Google's savvy use of algorithms.