More NewsFTC Moves to Restrain Affiliate Spammers

FTC Moves to Restrain Affiliate Spammers

An injunction underlines company liability for the actions of their affiliates.

A recently settled CAN-SPAM complaint underlines the liability of companies for the actions of their affiliates.

Backed by a U.S. District Court in Nevada, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is requiring several porn sites keep detailed records on affiliate marketers.

The injunction order, filed in August, requires defendants obtain a name, address and working phone number for each affiliate and sub-affiliate who markets their content. Additionally, seven days before a campaign launches, affiliates must certify to the defendants how each email address on their lists was obtained, together with details of the message content.

“It appears to me that the FTC is demanding better control of the affiliate marketing relationships,” said spam policy expert Trevor Hughes. “And it seems to me there is plenty of room for just that.

Hughes is executive director of the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI). He describes the reliance of advertisers on their affiliates and sub-affiliates as “cascading trust relationships” which can easily run amok.

“I worry that it is an issue that is ripe for real problems for the marketplace,” he said. “By the time the ad appears before the consumer, you may be three, four, eight or 10 steps away from the original advertiser.”

The three defendants addressed in the injunction operate porn sites and infrastructure under various names. In addition to the injunction order, they paid a total $621,000 in fines. The judge issued a default judgment against a fourth defendant, an affiliate marketer named Paul Rose, who spammed on behalf of his co-defendants. The FTC charged the defendants’ outbound emails violated CAN-SPAM and the agency’s adult content labeling rules.

“The settlement will bar future violations and will require the marketers to monitor their affiliates to assure they are complying with federal laws, as well,” the FTC noted in a statement. “While the affiliate sent many of the emails that allegedly violated federal law, under the CAN-SPAM Act all of the defendants are responsible for the emails, including the defendants who paid others to send the emails on their behalf.”

Related Articles

GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

Data & Analytics GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

3w Clark Boyd
What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

Legal & Regulatory What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

8m Al Roberts
Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

Media Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

8m Al Roberts
Is Twitter slowly dying?

More News Is Twitter slowly dying?

9m Al Roberts
FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

Ecommerce FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

9m Al Roberts
Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

Ecommerce Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

8m Al Roberts
YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

More News YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

9m Al Roberts
YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

Ad Industry Metrics YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

9m Al Roberts