Gateway 2000 to Pay $290,000 in False Advertising Case

Computer maker and Internet marketer Gateway 2000 (yes, the one with the cutecow packaging) has agreed to pay $290,000 as part of a false advertisingsettlement with the Federal Trade Commission.

Computer maker and Internet marketer Gateway 2000 (yes, the one with the cute cow packaging) has agreed to pay $290,000 as part of a false advertising settlement with the Federal Trade Commission.

According to the complaint detailing the charges, the FTC alleged that Gateway falsely advertised that it provides a “money back guarantee” of a “full refund,” when, in fact, it deducted the cost of shipping the merchandise to consumers, an average cost of over $62, from the refund amount.

The company also told they would be provided free “on-site service” upon request, when, in fact, the on-site service was not provided until Gateway diagnosed the problem over the telephone and determined that the consumer could not make the repair.

Under the proposed settlement, Gateway would be prohibited from misrepresenting its money back guarantee policy and its on-site service provision.

In addition, the FTC alleged that, in its written warranties, Gateway falsely represented the remedies available to consumers seeking incidental or consequential damages, completely disclaiming such liability despite the fact that some states do not allow for such exclusions or limitations.

The complaint also alleges that Gateway’s written warranty disclaimed all implied warranties, that Gateway failed to make the text of its written warranties readily available to prospective buyers prior to the sale, and that Gateway failed to include mandatory language concerning consumer’s legal rights in its written warranties–all of which violate either federal warranty law or its rules.

In a consent agreement in which the company admitted no wrongdoing, the company said it would pay approximately $290,000 to the U.S. Treasury–the amount equal to the shipping charges that Gateway should have refunded to consumers.

Individual consumers who should have received a refund generally could not be identified, the FTC said.

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Whitepapers

US Mobile Streaming Behavior
Whitepaper | Mobile

US Mobile Streaming Behavior

5y

US Mobile Streaming Behavior

Streaming has become a staple of US media-viewing habits. Streaming video, however, still comes with a variety of pesky frustrations that viewers are ...

View resource
Winning the Data Game: Digital Analytics Tactics for Media Groups
Whitepaper | Analyzing Customer Data

Winning the Data Game: Digital Analytics Tactics for Media Groups

5y

Winning the Data Game: Digital Analytics Tactics f...

Data is the lifeblood of so many companies today. You need more of it, all of which at higher quality, and all the meanwhile being compliant with data...

View resource
Learning to win the talent war: how digital marketing can develop its people
Whitepaper | Digital Marketing

Learning to win the talent war: how digital marketing can develop its peopl...

2y

Learning to win the talent war: how digital market...

This report documents the findings of a Fireside chat held by ClickZ in the first quarter of 2022. It provides expert insight on how companies can ret...

View resource
Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Experience Economy
Report | Digital Transformation

Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Experience Economy

1m

Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Exp...

Customers decide fast, influenced by only 2.5 touchpoints – globally! Make sure your brand shines in those critical moments. Read More...

View resource