Google will begin allowing advertisers in the United States to use trademarked terms in their advertisements — including ones they don’t own — a move designed to revive its sagging ad revenue but likely to irk brands that are already chafing at Google’s fast-and-loose policy toward trademark protection.
Google compared its old policy of not allowing trademarked terms in ads to Sunday circulars that only advertise “snacks for sale” or “shoes available,” in a blog post.
“The ads wouldn’t be useful since you wouldn’t know what products are actually being offered,” Dan Friedman of Inside Adwords wrote. “For many categories of advertisers, this is the problem they have faced on Google for some time.”
“Under certain criteria, you can use trademark terms in your ad text in the U.S. even if you don’t own that trademark or have explicit approval from the trademark owner to use it. This change will help you to create more narrowly targeted ad text that highlights your specific inventory,” he continued.
Those criteria include referring to the trademarked terms in “a descriptive or generic way,” and the advertiser must either be re-selling, facilitating the sale of or offering information about the trademark holder’s products or components of those products. Google says it will perform limited investigations into complaints about its clients violating those rules.
The new rules are not likely to improve Google’s standing among companies who complain that the search giant impinges their trademarks by letting competitors buy the rights to their brand names.
Earlier this week, Firepond, a Texas software company, filed a class-action suit against Google claiming trademark infringement because consumers searching for “Firepond” were clicking on the sponsored links of their competitors.
They're arguably the most annoying video ad formats in existence, but soon they'll be a thing of the past, at least on YouTube.
On Thursday, Twitter reported its earnings for Q4 2016, and the results have raised questions about the company's long-term future.
From its $1.5 billion air cargo hub to its growing network of contract last-mile delivery drivers, Amazon is increasingly looking like a logistics company; but shipping and logistics giant FedEx isn't sitting idly by.
Havas Group's Meaningful Brands report delivers sobering news for brands: consumers wouldn't care if 74% of the brands they use disappeared off the face of the earth.