Improving E-Mail Performance Through Testing

Too often, marketers cling to the same campaign elements and tactics without thoroughly testing email variables to determine what will drive performance higher. In fact a Jupiter Research study I recently concluded on the topic found that overall, about 60 percent of marketers don’t test. Challenged by resource constraints, most of these non-testers simply feel they don’t have the time to regularly test their campaigns.

Yet our research found the marketers who are testing on a regular basis (at least every other mailing) are almost twice as likely to have email conversion rates that exceed industry averages by one to two percent, as compared with marketers who don’t test. Clearly, the effort of testing email variables (e.g. subject lines, content) is offset by better results. Testing is really the only way for a marketer to determine which element drives higher results. It’s critical for optimizing email campaigns. To ease into testing, let’s take a look at some of the rudimentary items to test.

Identify Marketing Goals. While this sounds very basic, I do find on occasion that email becomes a primary promotional tool simply because it’s inexpensive. It is easy to get mired in the monotony of getting the email out and lose sight of specific campaign or mailing goals. Before you can conduct any testing you must first know what the desired outcome is.

Identify Consistent Audience Segments. One of the first elements to test, and an early deliverable that comes out of testing, is audience segmentation. Ensure your email solution can support multiple lists, and customer profiles can be easily divided into segments. Some attributes you’ll want to test related to audience segmentation include demographic data (e.g. income, age, sex); behavior (e.g. open, click); purchase history (e.g. recency, frequency); acquisition source; attitudes and domain (e.g. AOL, Yahoo). I’ve discussed using behavior and attitudinal segmentation in previous columns; take a look at those for more ideas.

Experiment With Message Formats. While HTML is the preferred format for most marketers, anti-spam measures, including image and HTML blocking at many leading ISPs, underscore the importance of testing message format. Look for differences in delivery, open rate, clickthrough rate and conversion. Testing formats on a domain level and obtaining insight into the domain level performance is critical to really understand the impact the message format has on performance.

Tinker With Content. One area likely to have the largest impact on campaign performance is testing different creative elements. Experiment with the subject line, personalized campaign elements, number of products and/or offers presented, and message tone. Research I’ve conducted has found personalization can have a dramatic impact on email conversion rates. Determining if personalization is appropriate for your campaigns can only be achieved through testing.

Test Frequency. In order to determine your optimal mailing frequency or the impact of triggered lifecycle campaigns, test message frequency over time. My column on message frequency offers some ideas on alternate mailing intervals.

While testing is beneficial and all the above items are just some of the variables you can test, it’s very important to adhere to the following basic testing guidelines to measure which element is driving the results.

  • Test only one variable at a time. Do this to determine which element is impacting performance test offers and subject lines, but don’t test both at the same time.

  • Maintain a control group. To understand how the segments that are being tested behave over time, maintain a control group that doesn’t receive any of the testing treatments.
  • Ensure tests occur on the same day. To minimize fluctuations in day-of-week response patterns, ensure all segments receive the tests on the same day of the week. That is, unless you’re testing day of week mailing patterns. If so, constrict the test to that one variable.
  • Ensure tests are statically accurate. While the size of mailing test cells depends on your mailing list and testing method (A/B, Nth, etc.), it’s recommended that each test cell can return at least 100 qualified responses. Based on response rates, this may require cells that contain as many as 10,000 to 15,000 names.

Trial and error is a central part of marketing. Hopefully, these suggestions will make your trials a bit more scientific. Good luck — and let me know how it turns out.

I’m currently conducting a survey of email marketing executives. Please click here to participate. Thanks!

Related reading

women-in-tech
nurcin-erdogan-loeffler_wikipedia-definition-the-future_featured-image
pwc_experience-centre_hong-kong_featured-image
12919894_10154847711668475_3893080213398294388_n
<