More NewsNYC Court Kills One “Cookie” Suit Against DoubleClick

NYC Court Kills One "Cookie" Suit Against DoubleClick

It's good news for the New York-based ad network, and for theindustry.

DoubleClick Thursday won a victory in its ongoing legal entanglements, with one of its class-action suits being thrown out in a New York City courtroom.

The case against Alley-based DoubleClick, 00 Civ. 0641, alleged that the firm’s use of “cookies” — small text files that anonymously records which sites a user visits — violates state and federal laws. The plaintiffs in the class action suit — 13 consumers in the New York area — alleged the company violated the Wiretap Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

But U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald dismissed the year-old suit, writing that DoubleClick’s practices weren’t illegal, but instead, were part of a publicly available and well-known business plan for commercial gain.

For those reasons, Judge Buchwald wrote in a 71-page opinion that the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence that DoubleClick violated any of the three federal laws.

Indeed, Buchwald ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate that DoubleClick gained unauthorized access to their computers. She also said that DoubleClick’s Web publishers were not violating visitors’ rights by passing on their information to the firm — since the exchange of information was overtly authorized by the publishers themselves, and tacitly by users’ decision to visit those sites.

Additionally, Buchwald said the intent of the three Acts were not to prohibit practices like DoubleClick’s use of cookies.

“This groundbreaking decision marks the first time a court has interpreted these statutes in the context of Internet advertising,” said Elizabeth Wang, said DoubleClick vice president and general counsel, in a statement reiterated by Buchwald.

The online ad serving firm isn’t out of the woods yet, however — it still faces similar suits in Texas and California. Nevertheless, it’s good news in a time when DoubleClick could use it. The news comes following admitted hacker break-ins earlier this week, raising questions about the ad network’s security practices among privacy advocates.

It also comes as the online ad industry is looking for credibility in the eyes of traditional advertisers — and many insiders feel that the ad networks’ ability to track post-click user activities, using cookies, is one of the industry’s most important offerings.

DoubleClick was represented by Morrison & Foerster, while the firms Millberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach and Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann represented the plaintiffs. Attorneys at Morrison & Foerster referred all questions to DoubleClick.

Related Articles

GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

Data & Analytics GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

3w Clark Boyd
What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

Legal & Regulatory What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

8m Al Roberts
Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

Media Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

8m Al Roberts
Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

Ecommerce Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

8m Al Roberts
YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

More News YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

9m Al Roberts
YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

Ad Industry Metrics YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

9m Al Roberts
Is Twitter slowly dying?

More News Is Twitter slowly dying?

9m Al Roberts
FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

Ecommerce FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

9m Al Roberts