Advertising by dot com companies in traditional media saw explosivegrowth over the first three quarters of 1999 with spending at $1.4billion, up 291.3 percent from the same period last year, according toCompetitive Media Reporting.
Advertising by dot com companies in traditional media saw explosive growth over the first three quarters of 1999, with spending at $1.4 billion, up 291.3 percent from the same period last year, according to Competitive Media Reporting (CMR).
If those numbers sound impressive, realize they do not include the holiday-season spending. Once included, CMR predicts that dot com companies have already more than doubled the $649.2 million spent offline for all of 1998.
CMR tracks advertising dollars spent on television, newspapers, magazines, radio, and outdoor. Its tracking technologies collect occurrence and expenditure data as well as the creative executions of over 900,000 brands in 15 media.
“This is surely one of the fastest growing industries, if not the fastest, we have ever seen,” said Jerry Arbittier, senior vice president corporate research and analysis CMR. “The holiday season has created a tremendous pressure for companies to draw people to their sites. We do not make predictions, but anyone who is watching TV, reading newspapers or magazines knows that fourth quarter spending is going to be tremendous.”
Increases in spending have been across every medium. Network TV, up 362.4 percent, claimed the most advertising dollars at $278.3 million. Magazines followed with $265.1 million, up 190 percent, and Cable TV was next, up 366.1 percent to $202.6 million.
Online broker E*Trade was by far the leading advertised Internet brand, spending $89 million in the first nine months, up 424.5 percent from $17 million during the same period in 1998. Value America was second, up 148.3 percent to $46.5 million, followed by Charles Schwab at $40.8 million, up 9,142.7 percent. Snap.com was fourth, up 1,096.8 percent to $38.1 million and Ameritrade, who did not have any ad spending in 1998, was fifth at $36.4 million.
Other significant top 10 spenders included Monster.com up 8,659.5 percent to $20.6 million and Go.com at $20.3 million and Discover Brokerage at $17.1 million.
| Top Internet Brands Spending Offline | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Brand | Jan.-Sept. 1999 | Jan.-Sept. 1998 | Percent Change |
| 1. | E*Trade | $88,985,000 | $16,967,100 | 424.5% |
| 2. | Value America Stores | $46,538,200 | $18,743,600 | 148.3% |
| 3. | Charles Schwab | $40,861,900 | $442,100 | 9,142.7% |
| 4. | Snap.com | $38,054,800 | $3,179,700 | 1,096.8% |
| 5. | Ameritrade | $36,388,900 | — | — |
| 6. | AT&T Business Network | $32,845,500 | 21,382,900 | 18.6% |
| 7. | America Online | $30,051,100 | 25,338,000 | 18.6% |
| 8. | Monster.com | $20,613,700 | 235,300 | 8,659.5% |
| 9. | Go.com | $20,306,200 | — | — |
| 10. | Priceline.com | $20,116,600 | 8,034,000 | 150.4% |
| 11. | Amazon.com | $17,730,400 | 14,028,500 | 26.4% |
| 12. | Discover Brokerage | $17,091,400 | — | — |
| 13. | AT&T Worldnet | $16,073,900 | 20,587,300 | -21.9% |
| 14. | Microsoft Online | $16,067,200 | 993,300 | 1,517.6% |
| 15. | Yahoo | $16,028,900 | 4,274,200 | 275.0% |
| Source: Competitive Media Reporting | ||||
| Dot Com Spending by Media | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Measured Media | Jan.-Sept. 1999 | Jan.-Sept. 1998 | Percent Change |
| 1. | Network Television | $278,275,800 | $60,184,500 | 362.4% |
| 2. | Magazines | $265,085,100 | $91,401,600 | 190.0% |
| 3. | Cable TV | $202,627,000 | $43,471,900 | 366.1% |
| 4. | Spot Television | $166,928,300 | $44,120,000 | 278.4% |
| 5. | National Spot Radio | $154,621,400 | $27,400,800 | 464.3% |
| 6. | National Newspapers | $148,659,900 | $41,404,000 | 259.0% |
| 7. | Newspapers | $69,392,900 | $17,522,500 | 296.0% |
| 8. | Network Radio | $43,137,500 | $17,172,200 | 151.2% |
| 9. | Outdoor | $24,640,300 | $3,972,400 | 520.3% |
| 10. | Sunday Magazine | $6,978,300 | $581,000 | 1,101.1% |
| 11. | Syndication | $5,715,200 | $1,910,700 | 199.1% |
| Source: Competitive Media Reporting | ||||
