More NewsOn Glam and Publisher Branded Ad Networks

On Glam and Publisher Branded Ad Networks

The controversy about Glam's traffic stats just won't die

The controversy about Glam’s traffic stats just won’t die. This week the debate reignited in a VentureBeat story and a TechCrunch post (“Is Glam a Sham?”), both evidently triggered by a rumor the company is pursuing a $200 million private funding round.

Critics harsh on Glam for touting its “largest destination” status among aggregators of women online, when the bulk of its inventory comes from a big ad network — and one that’s not overwhelmingly female-centric at that. (The Glam Network has large traffic contributions from MyYearbook.com among other gender-neutral sites). Certainly Glam deserves some of the rough treatment it’s getting, mainly for comparing itself to iVillage in the first place, which as ClickZ covered earlier this summer is off-base. Comparing it to Gawker Media’s audience – younger, more style conscious — makes as much sense.

Yet Glam was the first small-time premium publisher I’m aware of (please correct me if I’m wrong) to experiment with repping off-site inventory to kick up display ad revenues. Of course, Google, Yahoo, AOL and Microsoft all long ago built ad networks while maintaining central properties, and they succeeded to the point where high-end publishers with direct sales forces almost seemed to have ceded the whole concept to them. Then Glam jumped in, and many others have followed suit, including WaPo, MSNBC.com, Heavy.com and, yes, iVillage.

Plenty of people dislike the model Glam pioneered, feeling publishers should own their ad inventory. Gawker’s Nick Denton told me as much a few months back. However, I was also present weeks later when Tacoda Chairman Dave Morgan counseled Denton to ramp up an ad network of his own. (Denton’s response: “You’re evil, you know that?” Morgan’s retort: “Hey, I’m all about enabling free content online.”) Denton seemed half convinced by conversation’s end, so look out for a Gawker extended ad network.

Does it matter that Glam’s central brand is weak and its traffic sourced all over the Web? I like David Card’s relativist analyst. For big brand advertisers and the agencies that rep them: not if Glam can guarantee premium placement. For direct marketers: very little. For consumers: oh yeah. I’d add that it can be tough to court that first, most lucrative group of constituents if you haven’t already built a strong consumer brand. Glam’s trying to make up for that with lots of ad sales firepower. So far, the strategy seems to be working out fine.

Related Articles

GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

Data & Analytics GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

3w Clark Boyd
What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

Legal & Regulatory What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

8m Al Roberts
Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

Media Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

8m Al Roberts
Is Twitter slowly dying?

More News Is Twitter slowly dying?

9m Al Roberts
FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

Ecommerce FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

9m Al Roberts
Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

Ecommerce Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

8m Al Roberts
YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

More News YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

9m Al Roberts
YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

Ad Industry Metrics YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

9m Al Roberts