Maybe it’s because Bloglines has, in a very short time, become almost part of my DNA, but I’m not cottoning to Google’s just-launched Reader.
It’s the interface — all clicking, no scrolling. Lots and lots and lots of clicking. If you subscribe to as many feeds as I do, it kind of makes RSS into work.
Interesting name, though, and interesting to watch the big guns groping to rename RSS to this utterly simple technology to a mass audience. Yahoo! doesn’t really call it anything. You just edit “modules” on the My Yahoo! page.
I hear MSN is gunning for “Subscriptions” as a more consumer-friendly moniker. I have my doubts. Aren’t subscriptions usually something you pay for — or is that old school think? Not according to a few people I’ve had this discussion with. The other thing about that word is the implication you have to give up something: a name or an address. That might intimidate.
And “Reader”? The Web is a text-based medium. You read e-mail on Google, you read search results, heck, you read a lot of stuff. That name doesn’t grab me, either.
All in all, I don’t think RSS is really such a scary acronym. Do you? Got a better term? Reply in the comment section, please.
A lot of cool stuff is happening with email today. As an email marketer doing your job day in and day out, ... read more
Despite the fact that it faces growing competition from Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat, Google-owned YouTube is still one of the most popular ... read more