Technology companies gained the most overall brand value over the past year, according to the fourth annual list of the top 100 global brands compiled by Interbrand Corp. and BusinessWeek. Meanwhile, some of the most recognizable companies suffered losses.
The 2004 scorecard ranked the world’s most valuable brands, finding overall growth of 2.2 percent.
The biggest brand value growth on the list came from Apple, moving up seven places to #43, and registering a 24 percent gain. BusinessWeek attributed the iPod to the company’s strong showing, proving that loyalty-inspired products and high-tech consumers can positively impact the bottom line.
Amazon, Yahoo and Samsung were the other big gainers on the list, each posting double-digit increases to brand values. British bank HSBC was the only non-tech company to make the list of the biggest gainers.
The top two companies, Coca-Cola and Microsoft, suffered losses to their brand values in the last year – 4 percent and 6 percent respectively. The researchers’ scorecard blamed Coca-Cola’s losses on poor innovation and management, along with a lull in consumer demand, while Microsoft dealt with virus woes over the last year.
Both companies have recently made inroads in strengthening their brands by creating campaigns that nurture their ties to consumers. Coke embarked on a deliberate attempt to woo young consumers, in part through through Cokemusic.com, while Microsoft fostered community outreach through mini trade shows in airport lounges.
Kodak exhibited the largest drop in brand value – 33 percent – followed by Japan’s Nintendo, which lost 21 percent; AOL, 18 percent; Finland’s Nokia, 18 percent; and automaker Ford, 15 percent.
The U.S. is still home to more than half of the power 100, but the overall number of American companies on the list dropped from 64 to 58. Only two of the nine new entries – eBay and Estee Lauder – were American companies.
Companies that specialize in luxury goods were most prominent among the new entries: Porsche, Audi, Cartier, Estee Lauder, and Armani. Also making their debut were Siemens, UBS, and ING.
BusinessWeek and Interbrand use distinct criteria to determine the rankings of the global scorecard. Value is calculated as the net present value of the earnings that the brand is expected to generate and secure in the future from July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004, and the brand has to be valued at more than $2.1 billion.
The brands had to be global, generating significant earnings in the main global markets, and there had to be sufficient marketing and financial data publicly available for preparing a reasonable valuation. Each company also had to derive one-third of its earnings outside of its home country.
|Top Global Brands, 2004|
|Source: BusinessWeek, Interbrand Corp.|
Despite the fact that it faces growing competition from Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat, Google-owned YouTube is still one of the most popular ... read more
Amazon prides itself on being the most “customer-centric” company in the world, but according to investigative journalism non-profit ProPublica, Amazon’s algorithms are often anything but ... read more