More NewsStudy: Publishers, Agencies Clash over Web Billings

Study: Publishers, Agencies Clash over Web Billings

A new Jupiter report suggests that sites should avoid usurping agency creative duties, despite the promise of higher fees.

The dearth of ad dollars is contributing to online media companies and advertising agencies finding themselves at odds, according to a new report by Jupiter Media Metrix.

The conflict comes about as a result of two complementary forces — publishers’ desire to boost fees by taking on new duties, and advertisers’ search for unique and eye-catching ideas that often integrate closely into Web sites’ designs. (The greater acceptance and desirability of rich media, too, has encouraged the latter tendency.)

As a result, publishers often pitch their own creative services to advertisers, circumventing the client’s agency.

Additionally, publishers might be inclined to skirt agencies because of advertisers’ increasing willingness to bring agency work in-house. A recent Jupiter survey of top executives found more than a quarter of major advertisers were already taking over work previously handled by their agency, while an additional 21 percent said they were considering leaving their agency.

But Marissa Gluck, senior analyst at New York-based Jupiter, said it behooved publishers to be wary of alienating agencies. For one thing, traditional companies unfamiliar with Web advertising are increasingly relying on their agencies for guidance in their online ventures.

“Media companies are on the prowl to capture additional fees for creative services,” she said. “As the battle between agencies and media companies extends to creative budgets, media businesses will find themselves unable to compete over the long term.”

Additionally, Gluck said, advertisers ultimately would find themselves drifting back to agencies anyway, because of their creative expertise.

The issue recalls Web advertising’s first years of operation, during which sites routinely went directly to clients rather than through their ad agencies — which were hindered by a slowness in developing Internet practices.

During the initial phases of the dot-com burst, online publishers appeared ready to work with agencies to bring in new business to replace that of failed Internet ventures. Months later, several large online media players again seem willing to follow Jupiter’s advice in lieu of working to cut out the middleman.

Yahoo, for example, recently signed a sizable upfront deal with Arnold Worldwide. That’s a marked turnaround for a company that epitomized the straight-to-advertiser deal, and additionally, had a reputation for being difficult to work with.

Microsoft’s MSN too has made moves to strengthen relationships with agencies — establishing an Agency Alliance as part of its Advantage Marketing initiative, launched late last year.

Related Articles

GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

Data & Analytics GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

3w Clark Boyd
What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

Legal & Regulatory What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

8m Al Roberts
Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

Media Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

8m Al Roberts
Is Twitter slowly dying?

More News Is Twitter slowly dying?

9m Al Roberts
FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

Ecommerce FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

9m Al Roberts
Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

Ecommerce Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

8m Al Roberts
YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

More News YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

9m Al Roberts
YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

Ad Industry Metrics YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

9m Al Roberts