The Fortune 100 are not the only companies ignoring search engine optimization (SEO). According to a new study from Oneupweb, very few of the top online retailers had well-optimized sites, resulting in some missed opportunities to generate revenue.
Faring only slightly better than the Fortune 100, just a dozen of the first 100 companies profiled in Internet Retailer Magazine’s Top 300 Guide had well-optimized sites.
Surprisingly, some of the biggest names in e-tailing were absent from the 12 well-optimized sites. Among the well-optimized sites were national brand names Sears, Lowes, Walgreens, Nordstrom, and Sharper Image, along with players like Quixtar, Schwans, Blue Nile, Abe Books, Drs. Foster and Smith, JC Whitney, and Alibris.
“We were also surprised that sites in this study weren’t even more active SEO users than the study shows. We expected that these organizations would be more sales oriented and as such, more interested in building online traffic at the very least,” said Oneupweb president Lisa Wehr.
Wehr notes that in general, retailers had more well-optimized sites than the Fortune 100 companies. They also had fewer sites that were not optimized at all (36 compared to 44).
|SEO Usage by 100 Top Retailers|
|Moderately optimized sites||23|
|Nominally optimized sites||29|
The study evaluated site architecture, title tags, meta tags, keywords, and content. Oneupweb also looked at whether the sites fell on Google and Yahoo’s first, second, or third search result pages when appropriate keywords were used.
Of the 12 well-optimized sites, 67 percent appeared on Google’s first page, and 58 percent appeared on Yahoo’s first page. In total, 75 percent were among the search results on Google’s first three pages, and 67 percent showed up on Yahoo’s first three pages.
Pay-per-click (PPC) programs may be propelling some of the absent e-tailers to prime first page search positions, but the Oneupweb study only focused on organic results.
“If they didn’t appear in the natural or editorial listings as well, then we didn’t count them as having natural results on the first page. We recommend that companies use both natural optimization and PPC ads,” said Wehr.
Wehr outlined the benefits of the dual-pronged approach: “…[The] site has more coverage on the page or a higher frequency of the message; natural results provide credibility (like editorial) and PPC communicates your promotional messages (like advertising) and finally, changing messages in natural results is a long-term action and PPC messages can change rapidly.”
Lack of understanding about PPC and organic search are likely behind the lack of deployed optimization methods by Internet retailers. “They aren’t aware that natural SEO can be measured in the same way PPC is measured,” said Wehr, adding that the retailers may have “decided that purchasing PPC is something they can understand better and ease into slowly using internal resources — at least initially.”
In an often fragmented workplace, where various departments have varying opinions and goals, it can be challenging to get everyone on the same page and make strategy meetings productive.
On Thursday, Twitter reported its earnings for Q4 2016, and the results have raised questions about the company's long-term future.
In part one a few weeks ago, we discussed what brand TLDs (top level domains) are, which brands are applying for them and why they might be important. Today, we’ll take an in-depth look at the potential benefits for brands, and explore the challenges brand TLDs could help solve.
According to a report, references to hashtags appeared in just 30% of Super Bowl 51's commercials this year, down from 45% a year ago.