More NewsSuit Against Google, Overture, Kanoodle Moves Forward

Suit Against Google, Overture, Kanoodle Moves Forward

A bankrupt businessman's suit against paid search companies is still on.

A trademark infringement lawsuit against Overture, Google, and Kanoodle will move forward, after a judge rejected motions to dismiss the suit brought by Pets Warehouse’s Robert Novak.

In a decision in the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of New York, Judge Denis Hurley denied several motions by plaintiffs to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The suit alleges the defendants infringed on Pets Warehouse’s (PW) trademarks by selling its name as a keyword to their paid placement advertisers. It also accuses them of unfair competition, trademark dilution, deceptive practices, and interference with prospective business advantage.

“Not withstanding PW’s exclusive right to control the use of its famous Pets Warehouse mark, Kanoodle, Google and Overture actively assists [sic] competitors of PW in what is best described as a ‘bait and switch’ of PW’s actual and potential customers,” the suit says. Novak’s suit went on to explain that consumers clicking on results on the sites might end up buying from competitors, perhaps without even realizing they aren’t on the PW Web site. (Novak has since declared bankruptcy and lost the original PetsWarehouse.com URL where his online store had resided.)

The claims echo those under contention in the suit filed by American Blind and Wallpaper Factory against Google. The dispute is also similar to a long-running legal battle in which Playboy sued Netscape, now a subsidiary of America Online, for selling trademarked keywords tied to banner advertising. Playboy and AOL settled that suit early this year.

None of those cases sheds much light on the legality of the practice of selling trademarked names as keywords, which means Novak’s suit against Google, Overture and Kanoodle stands as good a chance as any of being precedent-setting.

In his ruling, Hurley granted Google’s motion to dismiss a claim of “breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relations and prospective business relations.” Novak had accused Google of refusing to take down certain discussions of PetsWarehouse.com on its Google Groups site.

Novak wants the judge to enjoin the defendants from selling sponsored links tied to the Pets Warehouse name. He’s also looking for $5 million in compensatory damages, and $1 million in punitive damages, along with court costs.

Neither Google nor Novak responded to inquiries by press time. Overture declined to comment.

Related Articles

GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

Data & Analytics GDPR: The role of technology in data compliance

3w Clark Boyd
What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

Legal & Regulatory What companies can learn from the We-Vibe lawsuit about the Internet of Things

8m Al Roberts
Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

Media Has advertising arrived on Google Home?

8m Al Roberts
Is Twitter slowly dying?

More News Is Twitter slowly dying?

9m Al Roberts
FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

Ecommerce FedEx launches fulfillment service to take on Amazon

9m Al Roberts
Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

Ecommerce Target is the top retail digital marketer, so why is it struggling?

8m Al Roberts
YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

More News YouTube is "on pace to eclipse TV" thanks to savvy algorithm use

9m Al Roberts
YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

Ad Industry Metrics YouTube is getting rid of 30-second unskippable pre-roll ads

9m Al Roberts