The 2001 Search Engine Awards, Part 2: Paid-Placement and Paid-Inclusion Winners
A marketer's eye view of Danny's ranking of 2001 search engine performance.
A marketer's eye view of Danny's ranking of 2001 search engine performance.
Last week, I explained why Google swept the awards for best overall search engine. This week, I’ll look at the paid-placement and paid-inclusion winners.
Best Paid-Placement Service
This category recognizes the best paid program providing guaranteed placement in search engine results.
Winner: Overture (GoTo)
Overture (formerly GoTo) was a favorite, gaining 45 percent of 210 valid votes. We agree that the service deserves to win. This is because Overture has made it easy to get a top listing on practically every major globally oriented search engine. It’s not perfect. For example, there were complaints in 2001 over a new minimum bid requirement. Despite this, Overture still remains an outstanding service for those with a budget. Here’s a sampling of comments about the service received as part of the voting:
Honorable Mentions: Google and Espotting.com
Yes, Google does have paid listings, through its self-serve “AdWords” program and through “Premium Sponsorships” text banners. Unlike some of Overture’s partners, Google makes it extremely clear when something is paid for on its results page. Google came in second, behind Overture, with 21 percent of the votes received. We felt it deserved an honorable mention for the popularity of its program and the commitment in delineating paid and unpaid content.
Espotting is a U.K.-based paid listings provider that has built an impressive distribution base within the U.K., France, and Germany. The company has additional European expansion plans. Espotting pulled 10 percent of the votes. We felt it deserved recognition for making paid placement easier in Europe.
Best Paid-Inclusion Service
This category recognizes the best paid program providing inclusion in a search engine’s listings. Unlike paid placement, inclusion typically does not guarantee placement. Nevertheless, it can be a valuable way for site owners to increase the representation of their sites in listings and gain traffic.
Winner: Inktomi
In this category, we went with our readers. Inktomi was clearly ahead of the competition in the voting, gaining 42 percent of 184 valid votes cast. The program provides wide distribution across a variety of Inktomi’s partner sites. Here are some comments received about the program from those who voted for it:
Other Notable Results
FAST (AllTheWeb) was second in the voting with 21 percent, then AltaVista with 20 percent. AltaVista deserves a special note because its program, for an extra fee, allows for “Listing Enhancements” to be made to a paid-inclusion link. This is a nice feature and is more creative than just charging for inclusion. It would be interesting to see if these could be offered unbundled from inclusion. After AltaVista came LookSmart, with 17 percent of the votes.
Google got a write-in. Google doesn’t offer a paid-inclusion program and considers them to be unfair to site owners and bad for searchers. That’s why Google got a vote, as explained by the comment with it: “The only good paid-inclusion service is not to have one. Why institutionalize corruption?” Another person expressed similar views when leaving a comment but not selecting a program: “There is no such thing as a good paid-inclusion service. They all suck.”
Next week, we’ll look at Best Design, Most Webmaster Friendly, and the Hall Of Fame inductees.