Barack Obama’s campaign spent over $3 million on TV ads in one state on Monday.
He’s spent about double that on the Web since January.
Yep, according to my calculations based on FEC reports, his campaign spent around $5.45 million on paid online media on the Web, into August.
How’s that for sharp contrast?
As I wrote in my recent Reuters commentary piece on Obama’s online ads:
The fact is political advertisers typically don’t use Internet ads to sway voters the way they do television ads. When it comes to the Web, they rely on things like video on YouTube and their official sites to have persuasive impact.
Not only is advertising on television a tough-to-break habit for political campaigns, they have yet to see online ads affect an election in an undeniable way.
Until there’s proof that an online ad moved people to vote for or against a candidate, the first full-fledged Internet election may be far off.
A class action lawsuit against an internet-connected pleasure device highlights the potential pitfalls a growing number of companies will face as they embrace ... read more
Google sparked a small firestorm last week as reports surfaced that its intelligent assistant device Google Home delivered an unsolicited advertisement to unsuspecting owners.
According to Internet Retailer's newly released The Best Digital Marketers in E-Commerce report, Target is the most effective marketer in online retail. So why is it struggling overall?
The rise of YouTube and digital video generally has a lot to do with the rise of the internet and the abundance of digital video content. But YouTube's ascendency is also the result of Google's savvy use of algorithms.