Digital MarketingStrategiesWhat Do All the Federal Enforcement Actions Against Marketers Mean?

What Do All the Federal Enforcement Actions Against Marketers Mean?

It's time to take more steps to not only prevent compliance and fraud issues, but to expose and remove those in the industry who are persistent offenders.

This year has seen numerous legal and enforcement actions against the interactive advertising industry. Actions by authorities range from Jesse Willms being accused by the Federal Trade Commission of defrauding almost a billion dollars, to DigitalPoint.com founder Shawn Hogan being criminally prosecuted for cookie stuffing. On top of that, dozens of other advertisers, networks, and marketers have been linked to fake news sites, acai berry diet scams, credit card fraud, and a general lack of ethics or common sense. It seems that almost every week there is a new scandal facing some company in the industry.

Taking action against unscrupulous members of the industry is generally a step in the right direction. However, it also deeply concerns me what these actions mean to us as an industry and how they will affect us all. Here are some key points that the industry needs to consider and seriously think about:

  1. Actions are no longer just against “fringe” elements of the industry. Attorney generals and the Federal Trade Commission used to only take on the “worst of the worst” in the industry. Now actions have been taken against companies with serious connections to the industry – companies worth hundreds of millions of dollars, not just spammers and scammers making a few million here and there. For example, if you Google Jesse Willms you note that he was already sued alongside a major player in the industry just a few years ago. Jesse Willms was a major advertiser in the industry over the years and had connections in almost every display, affiliate, or PPC network. Don’t think that enforcement agencies aren’t connecting the dots between companies.
  2. Consumers are more educated and know how to complain to the authorities. For those who think that they can “get away” with deceptive, fraudulent, and questionable advertising, think again. Almost every three-letter agency in the U.S. has a website where you can submit reports. Combine this with the media’s fascination with exposing anything in interactive advertising as a possible method to invade your privacy, and there’s a real possibility that if you’re doing something scummy, you will be shut down, exposed, sued, or even arrested.
  3. The industry is suffering because of these actions. As mentioned, the media loves to connect the dots and accuse the industry as a whole of being in league with Al-Qaeda. Front-page articles on major tech sites constantly connect our industry to issues with privacy, hacking, and general mischief. Every time the industry is brought up in a negative light, whether it’s because of networks allowing deceptive messages or an affiliate hacking Facebook, it creates a backlash from the media, legislators, and the general public. Remember, most of the population has no idea how a browser works, or why they are getting spam on Facebook – so they assume every company is the same, that their privacy is somehow being invaded. Because of this, ridiculous laws are passed against the industry, making it harder for legit companies to do business.

As an industry, we need to take more steps to not only prevent compliance and fraud issues, but to expose and remove those in the industry who are persistent offenders. If you are a display network, you need to take proactive steps to prevent deceptive or fraudulent advertisers from advertising with you: it’s no longer an acceptable excuse to say you aren’t responsible for their actions. If you are a technology company, you need to prevent known scammers from using your technology, because you are hurting the rest of your clients’ reputations. If you are one of those scammers, the guys who keep on promoting scams, showing up on the radar of enforcement agencies and consumers’ complaints, you will eventually get what you deserve: more lawsuits, more enforcement actions, and hopefully, eventually jail time.

Related Articles

Eight predictions about the future of big data

Data-Driven Marketing Eight predictions about the future of big data

2y Benjamin Spiegel
Reviving sluggish sales with email personalization

Conversion & ROI Reviving sluggish sales with email personalization

2y Guest Writer
What the influx of smart homes means for brand marketers

Data-Driven Marketing What the influx of smart homes means for brand marketers

2y Mike O'Brien
Win Over the Consumer With Data Transparency

Data-Driven Marketing Win Over the Consumer With Data Transparency

2y Yuyu Chen
4 Keys to Personalization in an Omnichannel World

Analytics 4 Keys to Personalization in an Omnichannel World

2y Pelin Thorogood
Europe’s highest court: safe harbor data sharing between EU, U.S. invalid

Marketing Europe’s highest court: safe harbor data sharing between EU, U.S. invalid

2y Yuyu Chen
IAB UK Provides Solutions to Five Major Industry Challenges

Marketing IAB UK Provides Solutions to Five Major Industry Challenges

2y Yuyu Chen
Consumers 'Resigned' to Giving Up Data, But Many Fear Consequences [Study]

Data-Driven Marketing Consumers 'Resigned' to Giving Up Data, But Many Fear Consequences [Study]

2y Emily Alford