I grew up with “Wills” lovingly Scotch-taped to my bedroom door, his boyish grin showering me with a daily dose of cute, causing me to lament why I wasn’t British-Canadian. (How the logistics of that one worked out on my warped road to the monarchy, I’m not sure.) So when it came to following the royal wedding last week, all the same warm, fuzzy feelings resurfaced through a simple scroll of my Facebook wall, and all that wholesome Prince William equity transferred upon anyone willing to jump on the wedding wagon: a recipe site’s rendition of chocolate biscuit cake? Yes, please! Achieve Kate Middleton’s wedding-day look with these overpriced makeup products? Adding now. Tired parody of JK Wedding Dance with incredibly well-cast lookalikes? Meh, I suppose.
A few hours later and five minutes into a British domain registrar’s “Can You Marry Harry” quiz (alas, 44 percent compatible), I realized just how deliciously digestible and easily marketable this event was – as if a generous pile of free “Likes” was there for the taking, and all the brands were diving in and hoarding away, drunk with just a taste of transient HRH-brand goodness. I was right there with them, reinforcing their tactics with my unsightly amounts of logged hours on their sites and shopping carts.
Fast forward to Sunday night, when an ominous release from the White House soon erupted into the news we know now – Osama bin Laden, dead. Many of us found out through our social networks, friends, and tweeters adding their own color commentary and politics to the news reports that ranged from comedy hour to patriotic hysterics. But as opposed to the love fest taking place just a few days prior, brands were mercifully quiet – with only a few subtle exceptions like this following example.
The contrast of these two uncomfortably close events begs the question: How does a brand develop a social conscience, knowing when to join the conversation and when to stay out?
I wish I had the magic formula, or an answer that wasn’t “Use common sense, stupid.” But what is tangible and understood is a level of PR-ninja sophistication – an ability to navigate through mass-interest, real-time subject matter and distill its social relevancy, sensitivity level, and general marketability through the filter of your brand. It’s about capitalizing on a moment of universal appeal without sacrificing the focus or strength of your brand voice.
As you encounter these topics and events, you’re able to use it as an opportunity to learn and interview yourself and your team about your brand’s current social positioning. Here are just a few example thought-starters to help you internalize your brand:
- Am I politically agnostic, or do I see value in taking a stance?
- Would I rather allow my community to guide the conversation, or am I responsible for starting and setting the tone for a given topic?
- Does my personality allow me to relate, “on the ground,” to my audience, or does it maintain that I keep a distance and remain above the fray?
- Would people care about my opinion on [Topic X]? Can I offer them a perspective that no one else could?
- How does [Topic X] benefit me? How does [Topic X] hurt me?
Far from formulaic, it’s still an area of experimentation (with plenty of yikes moments that most certainly varies by situation and brand. But it helps to look at every event as an opportunity to challenge yourself to play in that rare and ripe territory where brand culture intersects with popular culture. Identify and inspire conversation using these areas of overlap as boundaries to reign you in from stepping into faux pas territory, and trust in your audience to serve as guideposts.
I’m going back to re-take the Harry quiz, now. Looking forward to hearing your own take on how the past few weeks of events have informed you about brands and social commentary.
The internet has made it harder for brands to control the information available about themselves. With independent reviews on any business a few clicks away, what steps can brands take to manage their reputation effectively?
Twitter's own statistics say that videos are six times more likely to be retweeted than photos, and three times more likely than GIFs. But what is it that makes video on Twitter so effective?
Snapchat started as a simple messaging app that made the idea of ephemeral messages into a trend among social platforms.
Last Thursday, Snap, the parent company of Snapchat, went public. And in spite of questions about Snap's growth, finances and competition, investors were eager to buy shares in the company, bidding its shares up by 44% over the original offering price.