Longtime readers know I've always been a proponent of using email newsletters to establish an ongoing relationship with prospects and customers. A lot of you publish e-newsletters, which is great.
I review a wide range of newsletters. After receiving one last week, which practically made me feel dyslexic it was designed so poorly, I figured it's time for a column on design basics to help you get the most mileage from your e-newsletter efforts.
Think back to the days of Advertising 101. You may recall that when you design a print ad, people's eyes move in a fairly predictable pattern. If you design an ad with that in mind, the product is easier to read and comprehend. If your ad isn't designed in this manner, it's harder to read.
I asked one of my crack analysts if studies had been conducted on placement of content and ads on email newsletters based on eye movement. Luckily, he'd been involved in a fairly big test and was able to share some insight:
Most newsletters are set up in one of three ways:
- Content broken up by ads or promos vertically
- Content on the left, ads or promos on the right
- Content on the right, ads or promos on the left
My analyst said that a side-by-side test (see diagrams below) revealed people's eyes move in a "U." They start near the upper left hand portion of an ad, travel down the left side, go over to the right side, and up.
| Format "A" | Format "B" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Header Information |
Header Information |
||
| Ad or Promo |
Content | Content | Ad or Promo |
| Ad or Promo |
Content | Content | Ad or Promo |
| Ad or Promo |
Content | Content | Ad or Promo |
| Ad or Promo |
Content | Content | Ad or Promo |
Using the "U" navigation findings:
- Viewers of newsletter "A" started in the left side of the header area, went down the ads and promos, crossed over and went up to the content
- Viewers of newsletter "B" started in the same place, but saw the content first and the ads/promos second
Which format do you think had more clicks, better conversions and higher ROI?
The Results
- Format "A" had a 10 percent higher click rate on the ads and promos.
- Format "A" however had a 20 percent lower conversion rate from clicks than "B."
- Format "A" had a 12 percent lower effective CPM than "B."
If your newsletter is an "A," changing the design may improve results. It's certainly worth testing.
Lessons
These results may or may not hold true with your newsletter. If they do, a simple format change could make a big difference in profitability.
You'll also want to consider your email marketing messages. See if placement of various elements changes performance. It should be a trivial exercise to test several email formats (same copy, same offer, same price) to see if you can eke out a higher rate of return.
Keep reading...
Subscribe to Newsletters
Subscribe to RSS Feeds 
Paul Soltoff is the chief executive officer of SendTec, Inc., a direct marketing services company specializing in customer acquisition. SendTec combines extensive direct response experience with proprietary technologies to produce scalable results. Principal services include performance-based online marketing, offline direct response marketing and direct response television. SendTec represents advertising agencies and advertisers such as RealNetworks, AARP, Monster.com, AAA, Punch Software, MyPoints, Grey Worldwide, Cosmetíque Cosmetics, Columbia House, and Euro-Pro. Prior to starting SendTec, Paul was a founder and EVP of Saatchi and Saatchi's DRTV division in New York and has over 25 years of advertising, media and direct marketing experience.
Article Archives by Paul Soltoff
For Richer, for Poorer - Jun 27, 2005
Is Your E-Mail List Clean or Dirty? - Jun 13, 2005
Pull the E-Mail Trigger - May 16, 2005
One Size Does Not Fit All: Offers and Messaging - May 2, 2005
More article archives
We want to know what you think about
Paul Soltoff’s column, "Eye on E-Mail Newsletters"
Rant. Rave. Voice your opinion.
Archive




